Back
SUPREME COURT
, J
Manohar Lal – Appellant
Versus
Ugrasen – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. high court's prior decision being appealed. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. background of land acquisition claims. (Para 3 , 4 , 5 , 6) |
| 3. court's duty to deliberate on submissions. (Para 7 , 10) |
| 4. arguments regarding timelines and validity. (Para 8 , 9) |
| 5. limits on state powers to issue directions. (Para 11 , 12 , 13 , 14) |
| 6. revisional authority's functions highlighted. (Para 20 , 22) |
| 7. court cannot grant unrequested relief. (Para 28 , 29 , 30 , 31) |
| 8. court's findings based on procedural failures. (Para 38 , 39) |
| 9. need for true disclosure & abuse of process. (Para 43 , 44 , 46 , 48 , 49) |
| 10. final judgment issued. (Para 53) |
1. Both these appeals have been preferred by the appellants being aggrieved of the judgment and order of the Allahabad High Court dated 22nd July, 2003 passed in C.M.W.P. No.6644 of 1989 by which the High Court has allowed the Writ Petition filed by respondent No.1 - Ugrasen quashing the allotment of land made in
favour of appellant - Manohar Lal and further directed to make the allotment of land in favour of the said respondent - Ugrasen.
3. Facts and circumstances giving rise to these appeals are that lands owned and possessed by predecessor - in - interest of
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
