Back
SUPREME COURT
D.Y. Chandrachud, A.S. Bopanna, JJ
Keshav Baljee – Appellant
Versus
Bangalore Development Authority – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. allotment process flaws due to applicants' ineligibility. (Para 2 , 4) |
| 2. legal arguments challenging the validity of allotments. (Para 5 , 6) |
| 3. judicial assessment of eligibility criteria compliance. (Para 7 , 8) |
| 4. emphasis on public interest and proper administrative conduct. (Para 9 , 10) |
1. Leave granted.
2. These appeals are directed against judgment dated 11.8.2008 of the Division Bench of the Karnataka High Court whereby it allowed the writ appeal preferred by the Bangalore Development Authority (for short, the B.D.A.') in the matter of cancellation of the allotment of residential site to appellant, Keshav Baljee and dismissed the one filed by the other appellant, Arjun Baljee against the dismissal of the writ petition filed by him for quashing the order of cancellation of allotment.
3. The appellants are real brothers. In 2002, they applied for allotment of residential sites under the Bangalore Development Authority (Allotment of Sites) Rules, 1984 (for short, "the Rules"). Appellant, Keshav Baljee submitted two applications on 31.5.2002 and 13.12.2002. His brother, Arjun Baljee also submitted applications on 31.2.2002 and 13.12.2002. However, neither of the
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
