Back
SUPREME COURT
Markandey Katju, A.K. Patnaik, JJ
Bharat Aluminium Co. – Appellant
Versus
Kaiser Aluminium Technical Services Inc. – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. introduction of decisions and context (Para 1) |
| 2. factual background of the arbitration agreement (Para 2 , 3 , 4) |
| 3. challenging foreign awards and interim applications (Para 5 , 19 , 26) |
| 4. key arguments and legal interpretations (Para 6 , 7 , 10 , 11 , 12 , 16) |
| 5. counter-arbitration questions raised (Para 8 , 9 , 14) |
| 6. detailed discussions on legal subjects (Para 13 , 15 , 17 , 18) |
| 7. general overview of arbitration laws and history (Para 28 , 29 , 32) |
| 8. historical context of arbitration acts in india (Para 30 , 31 , 34 , 35) |
| 9. revisiting ratios in bhatia international and venture global engg. (Para 54 , 55 , 56) |
| 10. final conclusions on the scope of the arbitration act, 1996 (Para 57 , 58 , 59 , 60 , 61) |
1. Whilst hearing CA No. 7019 of 2005, a two - Judge Bench of this Court, on 16-1-2008, passed the following order: (Bharat Aluminium Co. v. Kaiser Aluminium Technical Services Inc., (2012) 9 SCC 649)
"In the midst of hearing of these appeals, the learned counsel for the appellant has referred to the three - Judge Bench decision of this Court in Bhatia International v. Bulk Trading S.A. /i>. ( (2002) 4 SCC 105 ) The said decision was followed in a recent decision o
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
