Back
SUPREME COURT
N.V. Ramana, CJ, Sanjay Kishan Kaul, J
Union of India – Appellant
Versus
Sandur Manganese & Iron Ores Ltd. – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. review petition filed by the union of india seeks to address previous judgment interpretations. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. due process and principles of natural justice considered. (Para 4 , 5 , 6) |
| 3. review criteria and statutory provisions discussed. (Para 8 , 9 , 10 , 11) |
| 4. grounds for review outlined: new evidence, errors apparent, and other sufficient reasons. (Para 12 , 13 , 14) |
| 5. review judgments not for substituting alternative views without error. (Para 20 , 21 , 24) |
| 6. final dismissal of review petition and directions for compliance. (Para 29 , 30 , 31) |
1. This review petition has been filed by the Union of India, Ministry of Mines, seeking review of the judgment and order dated 13.09.2010 passed in Sandur Manganese & Iron Ores Ltd. v. State of Karnataka and Others, 2010 (13) SCC 1 (Civil Appeal No. 7944 of 2010 and Civil Appeal Nos. 7945-54 and 7955-61 of 2010).
2. In Sandur (supra), this Court had interpreted various provisions of the Mines and Minerals (Development and Regulation) Act, 1957 (in short “the MMDR Act”) and the Mineral Concession Rules, 1960 (in short “the MC Rules”) framed thereunder. It is the grievance of the petitioner herein that this review is in
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
