Back
SUPREME COURT
A. K. Patnaik, J. S. Khehar, K. S. P. Radhakrishnan, A. K. Sikri, S. S. Nijjar, F. M. Ibrahim Kalifulla, JJ
Fraz Naseem and Others v. Union of India and Others
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. addressed unfilled postgraduate seats for the all-india quota. (Para 4 , 5 , 10 , 11) |
| 2. highlights challenges and management issues in seat filling. (Para 6 , 18 , 20) |
| 3. emphasizes regulatory compliance for educational admissions. (Para 23 , 54 , 56) |
1. Taken on board. Issue notice returnable within a week. Dasti service, in addition, is permitted.
2. In the meanwhile, the respondent States and Union Territories (Respondents 3 to 24) will not fill up the postgraduate medical seats belonging to the all - India quota.
3. List the matter after one week.
Before A. K. Patnaik; J. S. Khehar, JJ. (Order dated 26-7-2013)
4. Heard the learned counsel for the parties. We find that as many as 1651 seats of the all - India quota are still vacant for the postgraduate courses for the academic session 2013-2014.
5. Mr Sidharth Luthra, learned Additional Solicitor General referred to Para 16 of the affidavit filed on behalf of Respondents 1 and 2 to point out the difficulties that may be faced for filling up these 1651 seats through a fresh round of counselling.
6. We are not convinced with the difficulties pointed out by Mr Luthra. Mr Luthra will find out ways after consulting the aut
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
