1. Leave granted. The questions which arise for consideration in this appeal are whether the District Consumer Disputes Redressal Forum, Jhajjar (for short "the District Forum") committed a jurisdictional error by entertaining and allowing the complaint filed by the respondent ignoring the objection of limitation raised by the appellants and whether the State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, Union Territory, Chandigarh (for short "the State Commission") and the National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission1 (for short "the National Commission") committed grave error by dismissing the appeal and the revision filed by the appellants against the order of the District Forum.

3. After almost six years of the cancellation of allotment, the respondent filed a complaint under the Consumer Protection Act , 1986 (for short "the 1986 Act") and prayed for setting aside the order of cancellation and for issue of a direction to Appellant 3 to restore the