SUPREME COURT
, J
Haryana Urban Development Authority and Others v. Tej Refrigeration Industries Limited
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. jurisdiction and limitation issues in consumer complaints. (Para 1 , 5) |
| 2. limitations must be observed as per statutory provisions. (Para 10 , 11) |
| 3. ruling on dismissal of a complaint based on time-bar. (Para 12 , 14) |
1. Leave granted. The questions which arise for consideration in this appeal are whether the District Consumer Disputes Redressal Forum, Jhajjar (for short "the District Forum") committed a jurisdictional error by entertaining and allowing the complaint filed by the respondent ignoring the objection of limitation raised by the appellants and whether the State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, Union Territory, Chandigarh (for short "the State Commission") and the National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission1 (for short "the National Commission") committed grave error by dismissing the appeal and the revision filed by the appellants against the order of the District Forum.
2. The respondent was allotted Industrial Plot No. 115, Phase I, Bahadurgarh subject to the terms and conditions embodied in the allotment letter dated 8-2-1978. Due to the respondent's failure to raise construction within the stipulated period, the Estate Officer, Haryana Ur
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.