SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2014 Supreme(Online)(SC) 125

SUPREME COURT
R. F. Nariman, B. R. Gavai, JJ
Govt. of NCT of Delhi – Appellant
Versus
Ajay Kumar – Respondent


Advocates:
For the Appellants: L.N. Rao
For the Respondents: P.S. Narasimha

Table of Content
1. judicial review limitations on setting compensation rates. (Para 1)
2. facts surrounding land acquisition and legal challenges. (Para 2 , 3)
3. court’s directives on compensation determination and urgency. (Para 4 , 5 , 6)
4. authority of the land acquisition collector to determine value. (Para 7)

1. Leave granted. Whether the Division Bench of the Delhi High Court could, while deciding the writ petitions filed by the respondents for quashing the acquisition of their land, pass interim orders and compel Respondent 1 Government of NCT of Delhi to issue notification making circle rates as the prime criteria for determination of the compensation payable under the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 (for short "the 1894 Act") and then direct that the same shall be made applicable to the acquisitions made prior to issue of notification is the question which arises for consideration in these appeals.

3. The respondents challenged the acquisition proceedings in Writ Petitions Nos. 2109 and 5480 of 2008 and prayed for the following reliefs:
"(i) Issue a writ of certiorari / mandamus or any other appropriate writ, order or directions thereby quashing the Notification issued under S.4












Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top