SUPREME COURT
Dipak Misra, Pinaki Chandra Ghose, JJ
Kalkajimandir Vikreta Sangathan-II v. Piyush Joshi and Others
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. clarification of land ownership related to religious property. (Para 1 , 2 , 3) |
| 2. call for formal management plans for the temple. (Para 11 , 17 , 20) |
| 3. emphasis on cleanliness and hygiene in religious institutions. (Para 41 , 42) |
1. Mr. R.K. Bhardwaj, learned counsel for Respondent 3 may produce sufficient material to show that the land initially had not been endowed to the deity rather it had been given to the pujaris who claim to inherit the said property and manage the same.
2. In Vol. II of the paper book at p. 157, there is a document which shows that the Municipal Corporation had allotted the piece of land measuring 7' x 5' PCO to one Mr. Manish Jain, from handicapped quota, near Fire Brigade Office. Therefore, Mr Sanjib Sen, learned counsel appearing for Respondent 7 Municipal Corporation of Delhi may explain under what authority of law, such an allotment had been made and how many such allotments have been made by the Corporation.
3. Mr. R. K. Khanna, learned ASG along with Mr. D.S. Mahra, Advocate appearing for Respondents 8 and 9 is directed to take notice on behalf of Respondents 2 and 4 and he assures us that some responsible officer of Respondents 2 an
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.