1. The refusal of the Delhi High Court to exercise its inherent jurisdiction under S.482 CrPC to quash the criminal charges framed against the accused - appellants has been challenged in the present appeals. Specifically, the appellants, Rajat Prasad and Arvind Vijay Mohan who are the sixth and fourth accused respectively in CC Case No. 28 of 2005 (hereinafter referred to as A6 and A4) in the Court of the learned Special Judge, CBI, Delhi had assailed the order dated 24/25/04/2007 passed by the learned Trial Court framing charges against them under S.120B of the IPC read with S.12 of the Prevention of Corruption Act , 1988 (hereinafter for short 'the Act') before the High Court. The High Court by its order dated 30/05/2008 refused to interfere with the said order of the learned Trial Judge. Hence, the present appeals by s