SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2017 Supreme(Online)(SC) 1507

SUPREME COURT
, J
State of Madhya Pradesh – Appellant
Versus
Dilip Singh Patel – Respondent


Table of Content
1. classification of employees under statutory provisions. (Para 1 , 2)
2. arguments concerning entitlement to revised pay. (Para 3)
3. observation on minimum wages and increment eligibility. (Para 4 , 5)
4. final ruling on benefits and payment timeline. (Para 6)

1. Leave granted. These appeals have been preferred by the appellant State of Madhya Pradesh and others against the judgment and order dated 30-3-2012 passed by the High Court of Madhya Pradesh, Bench at Gwalior in State of M.P. v. Dilip Singh Patel, Writ Appeal No. 163 of 2012, decided on 30-3-2012 (MP) and order dated 2-11-2012 passed in Dilip Singh Patel v. State of M.P. , 2012 SCC OnLine MP 9649. By the impugned judgment, the Division Bench of the High Court affirmed the order dated 14-2-2012 passed by the learned Single Judge in Dilip Singh Patel v. State of M.P. , 2012 SCC Online MP 1071 and the review petition against the said order was dismissed.

2. The factual matrix of the case is as follows: the respondent employees were classified as permanent employees as per the statutory provisions of the M.P. Standing Standards Orders. However, they were not granted the benefit of Sixth Pay Commission. The le




Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top