SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2015 Supreme(Online)(SC) 325

SUPREME COURT
, J
State – Appellant
Versus
M/s Aryaverth Udyog – Respondent


Table of Content
1. background and facts of the business of the respondent. (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4)
2. impact of the circular on tax liabilities. (Para 5 , 6 , 7)
3. writ petition filed against the reassessment notice. (Para 8 , 9)
4. judicial examination of the high court's ruling. (Para 10 , 11 , 12)
5. legal principles regarding reassessment threshold and limitations. (Para 15 , 16 , 30)

1. These appeals are directed against the common judgment and order passed by the High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Bench at Lucknow in Aryaverth Chawal Udyog v. State of U.P., 2008 (6) All LJ 338 : 2008 SCC Online All 579 dated 22-5-2008, whereby and whereunder, the High Court, while upholding the legality of Circular No. 137, dated 29-3-2007/30-3-2007 issued by the Commissioner of Trade Tax, has quashed the reassessment proceedings initiated under S.21 of the U.P. Trade Tax Act, 1948 (for short "the Act").

2. Since these appeals arise out of a common judgment and order of the High Court and factual matrix in all the appeals is also identical, while disposing of these appeals by this common judgment and order, we would only notice facts in the lead matter, Civil Appeal No. 6714 of 2009, in respect




























































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top