Back
SUPREME COURT
string, J
workman – Appellant
Versus
Karnataka – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. the facts of the case involve the workman's termination for alleged misconduct. (Para 2 , 3 , 4) |
| 2. arguments revolve around the validity of the dismissal and the treatment of similar cases. (Para 5 , 6 , 7) |
| 3. court observations affirm the legitimacy of the labour court's decision. (Para 8 , 9 , 10) |
| 4. the ratio decidendi establishes the limits of judicial review on disciplinary matters. (Para 11 , 12 , 13) |
| 5. the judgment results in the reinstatement of the workman, restoring the labour court's award. (Para 14 , 15 , 16) |
1. Leave granted.
2. This appeal by special leave arises out of the judgment dated 3.9.2012 passed by the High Court of Karnataka, in and by which, the High Court dismissed the appeal filed by the appellant - workman thereby, confirming the termination of the appellant.
3. Brief facts which led to the filing of this appeal are as under: - The appellant was appointed on the post of Driver in the Bangalore Metropolitan Transport Corporation on 3.9.1985 and was working on the same post since then. The appellant was served with article of charge dated 3.9.1990 alleging that he had secured appointment by producing a false transfer certificate. An enquir
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
