SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2015 Supreme(Online)(SC) 359

SUPREME COURT
A. Mohammad Mustaque, Ashok Bhushan, JJ
P. R. Yelumalai – Appellant
Versus
N. M. Ravi – Respondent


Table of Content
1. non-compliance with judgment terms leads to automatic dismissal. (Para 3 , 4 , 5 , 6)
2. the court must adhere to procedural rules regarding notices and compliance. (Para 9 , 10)
3. court discretion allows for time extensions under specific conditions. (Para 11 , 12 , 13 , 14 , 15)

1. Leave is granted in both the matters.

3. The factual background of the case is that on 04/08/2006, one P. R. Yelumalai, who is the appellant in the first appeal, entered into an Agreement of Sale with N. M. Ravi, the respondent in the first appeal, is the absolute owner of the property. The total consideration for the sale was Rs.41,60,000/-, out of which a sum of Rs.8 Lakhs was paid as advance money towards the total consideration amount. Thereafter, the Seller vide legal notice dated 04/09/2006 sought to cancel the agreement of sale which was refused by the Buyer. This led to filing of a suit for specific performance of the contract by the Buyer P. R. Yelumalai (hereinafter referred to as "the Plaintiff - Buyer"), before the II Additional Civil Judge (Sr. Division), Kolar, being OS No. 439/2006. The Seller N. M. Ravi (hereinafter referred to as "the Defendant - Seller") conceded to th
















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top