SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2015 Supreme(Online)(SC) 379

SUPREME COURT
D. K. Jain, J
Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax and Another v. Zuari Estate Development and Investment Company Ltd.


Table of Content
1. facts of sale agreement and performance. (Para 1 , 2)
2. challenge to assessment notice. (Para 3)
3. court's reasoning on acceptance of returns. (Para 4)
4. remand for reassessment based on set aside judgment. (Para 5 , 6)

1. The admitted facts are that the income tax return filed by the respondent assessee for Assessment Year 1991-1992 was accepted under S.143(1) of the Income Tax Act . After some time, the assessing officer came to know that there was a sale agreement dated 19-6-1984 entered into between the respondent and Bank of Maharashtra to sell a building for Rs 85,40,800 on the condition that the sale would be completed only after five years of the agreement but before expiration of sixth year at the option of the purchaser and the purchaser can rescind the same at certain consideration. After the Bank had paid to the assessee company on 20-6-1984 the sum of Rs 84,47,111, being 90% of the consideration agreed upon, the assessee put and handed over possession in part performance of the agreement of sale to the Bank on 20-6-1984 itself.

2. By the letter dated 12-6-1990, in terms of Clause 5 of the agreement of sale dated 19-6-1984, the Bank called upon the as






Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top