SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2015 Supreme(Online)(SC) 481

SUPREME COURT
A.M. Khanwilkar, Dinesh Maheshwari, JJ
State of Punjab v. Bittu and Another Etc.
Criminal Appeal No. D - 341, 407, 607 and 772 of 2004



Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: Mr. Jayant K. Sud
For the Respondents: None mentioned

A motive alone is insufficient for conviction without substantive evidence connecting the accused to the crime.

Headnote:The case involves an appeal against the acquittal of the accused from charges under IPC Sections 302, 364, 201, and 120B based on a High Court ruling. The prosecution's reliance on witness testimonies was deemed insufficient as crucial witnesses turned hostile, lacking compelling evidence. The court emphasized the need for a cohesive chain connecting the accused to the crime while underscoring that motive alone cannot secure a conviction. The appeals against acquittal are dismissed, upholding the High Court’s judgment.

Table of Content
1. appeals against high court acquittal (Para 1 , 5)
2. factual background and trial court's convictions (Para 2 , 3 , 4 , 6)
3. discussion on witness credibility and evidence (Para 9 , 10 , 11 , 12 , 13)
4. final decision and dismissal of appeals (Para 14)

1. These appeals by special leave have been directed against the judgment and order dated 11.8.2011 passed by the High Court of Punjab and Haryana at Chandigarh in Criminal Appeal No. D - 341, 407, 607 and 772 of 2004 whereby the High Court allowed the criminal appeals filed by the respondents herein and acquitted them from offence punishable under S.302, S.364, S.201, S.120B of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 [hereinafter referred to as " IPC "].

2. The brief facts necessary to dispose of these appeals are that on 9.10.2002, a police party headed by SHO Jaswinder Singh, along with other police officials, was on patrolling duty in the area of truck union, Bhawanigarh. The complainant Gurdip Singh son of Arjan Singh, resident of Village Kasba Bharawal, Police Station Malerkotla came there and got his statement recorded with the SHO Jaswinder Singh, to the following effect: That on the preceding night at about 2:00 a.m., when he was performing his duty at the Dera Kar Sewa, Balad Crossing, Bhawanigarh, he saw the accused persons Bittu, Neetu, Tony, Jagdeep@ Michu and Ashok Kumar @ Rocky (deceased), who were known to him, coming towards the Dera from Bhawanigarh side. In the meantime, Harkesh Kumar (PW - 2) who was a resident of Bhawanigarh also came there. Bittu, Neetu, Tony and Michu threw Ashok Kumar (the deceased) on the floor and placed a big stone on his chest. They forcibly closed his nose and mouth after which Ashok Kumar became unconscious. Thereafter, the accused persons dragged him towards the main road, where his clothes were removed and they stuffed his mouth with soil. The complainant and Harkesh Kumar asked the accused persons not to do so. Shortly after that, accused Jaswant Singh also came there on a Maruti Car bearing No. PB - 34/1110. He along with other accused, loaded the body of Ashok Kumar in the car on the pretext that they were going to admit him in the Civil Hospital, Bhawanigarh. They threatened the complainant and Harkesh Kumar with dire consequences, if they disclosed the incident to anybody. In the next morning, the complainant and Harkesh Kumar came to know that the dead body of Ashok Kumar and his clothes were lying on the road near the Dera of Baba Sham Giri. Upon this statement of the complainant, a formal FIR was recorded.

3. After investigation the Police filed its report and the prosecution presented the challan against the accused persons in the Court of Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Sangrur, on 2.1.2003. Thereafter, the case was committed to the Court of Sessions Judge, Sangrur. After considering the material on record and hearing the prosecution and defence, charges under S.120 - B, 364, 302 and 201 of the Indian Penal Code were framed, read over and explained to the accused persons who pleaded not guilty and claimed for trial.

4. The Trial Court by its judgment and order dated 19.3.2004, convicted the accused / respondents and sentenced them as follows: Bittu, Neetu, Tony and Jagdeep Singh were convicted under S.302 IPC and sentenced to undergo life imprisonment and pay a fine of Rs.10,000/- each, in default whereof they were directed to undergo further R.I. for one year each. They were further sentenced to undergo R.I. for 10 years and R.I. for 5 years under S.364 and S.120 - B of the , respectively, and pay a fine of Rs.2,000/- and Rs.1,000/- each, with default clauses. They were further sentenced to undergo R.I. for 3 years under S.201 and to pay a fine of Rs.1,000/- each, in default whereof each of them were to undergo R.I. for 3 months. Accused Jaswant Singh was sentenced to undergo R.I. for 3 years under S.120 - B of and to pay a fine of Rs. 1,000/- in default whereof he was to undergo further R.I. for 3 months.

5












Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top