Back
SUPREME COURT
M.Y. Iqbal, A.M. Khanwilkar, JJ
Ghanshyam Sarda v. Sashikant Jha Director M/s JK Jute Mills Co. Ltd. and Others
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. violation of prior court orders (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. procedural compliance under bifr (Para 3 , 4 , 5 , 6) |
| 3. allegations of contempt for disobedience (Para 7 , 8 , 9) |
| 4. rejection of the contemnors’ defenses (Para 10 , 12 , 14) |
| 5. court's authority on contempt and implications (Para 16 , 18 , 24) |
| 6. final ruling and sanctions imposed (Para 26 , 27 , 28) |
1. Contempt Petition (Civil) Nos.338 of 2014 and 375 of 2014 at the instance of Ghanshyam Sarda, appellant in Civil Appeal No.10221 of 2014 and J.K. Jute Mills Mazdoor Ekta Union, appellant in Civil Appeal No.10223 of 2014 (‘applicants’, for short) seek to highlight disobedience and violation of the Order dated 08.05.2014 (“Order of 08.05.2014”, for short) passed by this Court in said Civil Appeals and other connected matters. The text of the Order of 08.05.2014 was to the following effect:
“Since it is not possible for us to take up the matter today, learned senior counsel appearing for the parties seek leave to mention before the Vacation Bench for seeking urgent hearing of the matter.
Permission is granted.
It would be open to the parties to mention before the Vacation Bench for urgent hearing of the matter.
However, it
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
