Back
SUPREME COURT
X, J
Charitable Trust – Appellant
Versus
Unregistered Body of Employees – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. background of case with educational institutions and pay scales. (Para 2 , 3 , 4 , 5) |
| 2. discussion of government resolutions about pay scales. (Para 6 , 7 , 8 , 9 , 10) |
| 3. details of writ petitions concerning pay scale claims. (Para 14 , 15 , 17 , 18) |
| 4. high court's reasoning behind the judgment. (Para 21 , 22 , 23 , 24) |
| 5. importance of education in society and constitution. (Para 25 , 32 , 36) |
| 6. non-discrimination and equal pay arguments. (Para 56 , 59 , 76) |
| 7. court's position on remedy and appeal outcome. (Para 80 , 82 , 89) |
1. Leave granted.
2. The first appellant in all these three appeals is a charitable trust registered under the Bombay Public Trusts Act, 1950 . The first appellant established and has been administering two engineering colleges, one at Nanded and another at Aurangabad in the State of Maharashtra. The first respondent appears to be an unregistered body of persons who are the employees of the first appellant. They are the staff of the abovementioned two engineering colleges belonging either to the category of teaching or non - teaching staff. The details of which are not necessary for the purpose of this case.
3. In the year 2002, the first res
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
