Back
SUPREME COURT
Judge Name, J
Anil Kumar Agarwal – Appellant
Versus
Braj Bhushan Lahariya and another – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. application filed to challenge acquittal. (Para 1 , 3 , 6) |
| 2. contentions on appeal maintainability. (Para 4 , 7) |
| 3. discussion on procedural norms for appeals. (Para 5 , 9 , 10 , 11 , 12 , 18) |
| 4. identify appeal pathways for victims and complainants. (Para 16) |
| 5. referral of matter for larger bench interpretation. (Para 20 , 21) |
1. The present application under S.482 Cr.P.C. has been filed with the prayer to quash the judgment and order dated 16.11.2015 passed by the Additional District and Sessions Judge, Fast Track Court, Jhansi in Criminal Appeal No. 145 of 2013 (Anil Kumar Agarwal v. Braj Bhushan Lahariya and another) under S.378, Cr.P.C., P.S. Nawabad, District Jhansi.
3. It was submitted by the learned counsel for the applicant that the appeal against acquittal in a complaint case under S.138 Negotiable Instruments Act (in short 'the Act') was maintainable before the concerned Sessions Judge. The impugned order passed by the Court below is illegal. In support of his submissions, learned counsel for the applicant placed reliance on the following decisions:
1. Ashok Kumar Srivastava and others v. State of U.P. and another in application u/S. 482 No. 5934 of 2012, d
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
