Back
SUPREME COURT
Judge, J
Competition Commission of India – Appellant
Versus
Co-ordination Committee – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. background facts regarding alleged anti-competitive actions (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 , 5) |
| 2. provisions of competition act against anti-competitive agreements (Para 6 , 7 , 8) |
| 3. definitions relevant to anti-competitive agreements (Para 9 , 10 , 11) |
| 4. task of determining relevant market and factors (Para 12 , 13 , 14) |
| 5. arguments presented by co-ordination committee and eimpa (Para 16 , 17 , 18 , 20) |
| 6. dissenting opinion on relevant markets and implications (Para 19 , 21 , 22 , 24) |
| 7. final judgment affirming anti-competitive conduct (Para 35 , 42) |
| 8. nature of agreements under s.3 and economic activity (Para 38 , 39 , 40 , 41) |
| 9. conclusion and order allowing cci's appeal (Para 43) |
1. This appeal raises an interesting and important question of law touching upon the width and scope of jurisdiction of the Competition Commission of India (for short, the 'CCI') under S.3 of the Competition Act , 2002 (hereinafter referred to as the 'Act'). Before we mention the nuances of the issue that has arisen for consideration, it would be apposite to take stock of the background facts under which the issue needs determination, as the factual canvass would provide clarity of the situation
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
