State of U.P. vs All U.P. Consumer Protection Bar Assn.

Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

2018 Supreme(Online)(SC) 3432

SUPREME COURT
N/A, N/A
State of U.P. – Appellant
Versus
All U.P. Consumer Protection Bar Assn. – Respondent

Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: N/A
For the Respondents: N/A

Table of Content
1. constitution of a committee for assessing consumer forum infrastructure. (Para 1 , 2)
2. directions for uniform model rules under the consumer protection act. (Para 4 , 5)
3. court's determination for necessary follow-up on compliance with directives. (Para 6 , 7 , 8)

1. By an order dated 14-1-2016 ( State of U.P. v. All U.P. Consumer Protection Bar Assn. , 2016 (11) SCC 606 : 2016 (4) SCC (Civ) 473, this Court while dealing with the paucity of infrastructure in the Consumer Fora, constituted a three - member Committee consisting of:
1. Dr. Justice Arijit Pasayat, Former Judge, Supreme Court of India.
2. Ms. Justice Rekha Sharma, Former Judge, High Court of Delhi.
3. The Secretary to the Government of India, Department of Consumer Affairs or his nominee.

3. The Committee was requested to forward its deliberations to the State Governments, on the completion of their deliberations qua each State to facilitate appropriate steps in a time - bound manner.

5. On 7-3-2017(State of J.P. v. All U.P. Consumer Protection Bar Assn., Civil Appeal No. 2740 of 2007, order dated 7-3-2017 (SC)), the following directions were issued:
"During the course of hearing today, the proposed rules

Click Here to Read the rest of this document