US Constitution Trumps Presidential Tariff Powers
28 Feb 2026
Non-Compliance with Court Summons Amounts to Contempt: Allahabad HC Issues Warrant Against HDFC Life Branch Head in Cheating Bail Case
02 Mar 2026
Bank Can Adjust OTS Deposit on Borrower Default, No Cheating u/s 420 IPC: Delhi High Court
02 Mar 2026
Divij Kumar Quits CMS INDUSLAW for Independent Practice
03 Mar 2026
Global Lawyers Debate AI Liability in Autonomous Vehicles
03 Mar 2026
CCPA Fines Startup ₹8 Lakh for False Child Growth Claims
05 Mar 2026
Madras High Court Scoffs at Police Custody Injury Claim
05 Mar 2026
India's Criminal Investigations Face Systemic Conviction Crisis
05 Mar 2026
Kerala HC Slams TDB Financial Discipline in Ayyappa Conclave, Orders Auditor Report on Past Anomalies: High Court of Kerala
06 Mar 2026
SUPREME COURT
N.V. Ramana, CJ, R. Bhanumathi, J, A.S. Bopanna, J
Assessment of the Criminal Justice System in Response to Sexual Offences In Re v. Nil
Headnote: Read headnote
1. Post Nirbhaya incident, which shocked the conscience of the nation, many amendments were introduced in Criminal Law redefining the ambit of offences, providing for effective and speedy investigation and trial. Still, the statistics would reveal that desired results could not be achieved. As per the latest report of the National Crime Records Bureau of Crime in India in the year 2017, total 32,559 cases of rape were registered in India.
2. The delay in such matters has, in recent times, created agitation, anxiety and unrest in the minds of the people. The Nirbhaya case is not an isolated case where it has taken so long to reach finality. In fact, it is said that it has been one of the cases where agencies have acted swiftly taking into account the public outrage.
The judgment underscores the need for compliance with legal provisions ensuring effective handling of sexual offences, timely investigations, and protective measures for victims.
The central legal point established in the judgment is the importance of DNA verification in rape cases, especially those involving minors, as highlighted in the provisions of section 53-A of the Cri....
In rape cases, the credibility of the prosecutrix's testimony is paramount, and delay in filing an F.I.R. may not be fatal under particular circumstances.
(1) Sectarian violence and strife in Manipur – Clashes between Kuki and Meitei Communities – Victims of violence must receive remedial measures irrespective of their community – There is a pressing n....
The conviction for rape of a minor was upheld based on credible eyewitness accounts and consistency with medical evidence, affirming the trial court's judgment.
The court established that a conviction for rape requires credible testimony from the prosecutrix, supported by corroborative evidence, especially when inconsistencies and delays in reporting exist.
The court affirmed that a victim's testimony can suffice for conviction in sexual assault cases, emphasizing the heinous nature of the crime and the mandatory minimum sentence under the POCSO Act.
Lalita Kumari v. State of U.P.
-
Read summaryLillu v. State of Haryana
-
Read summaryState of Kerala v. Rasheed
-
Read summaryNipun Saxena v. Union of India
-
Read summary
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.