SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2022 Supreme(Online)(SC) 824

SUPREME COURT
Sanjay Kishan Kaul, Abhay S. Oka, JJ.
PLR Projects Pvt. Ltd. (M/s) v. Mahanadi Coalfields Limited


Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners:
For the Respondents: Bar Council of India

Table of Content
1. technical advancements in judiciary. (Para 1 , 2)
2. concerns about the conduct of advocates. (Para 3 , 4)
3. violent obstruction reports. (Para 5 , 8)
4. disciplinary measures against bar associations. (Para 10 , 13)
5. ensuring court functioning. (Para 14 , 15)
6. further status update required. (Para 16 , 17)

1. Two affidavits have been filed before us.

3. There is, however, something more to it!

5. The matter deteriorated to a stage where the District Judge, Khurda at Bhubaneswar received reports about violent obstruction to the judicial officers, staff and litigants by members of the Bhubaneswar Bar Association restraining them in entering court building on 25.11.2022. In fact, after receiving reliable information, the District Judge had sought for police protection for judicial officers, staff and litigants. 300/400 Advocates obstructed them when staff and officers reached there and police personnel reached at about 11 a.m. But even under police protection, the Bar members prevented access by violently obstructing them. The District Judge also reported that no prior information was given to him by the Bar Association regarding such picketing on 25.11.2022.

7. There





Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top