SUPREME COURT
Sanjay Kishan Kaul, Abhay S. Oka, JJ.
PLR Projects Pvt. Ltd. (M/s) v. Mahanadi Coalfields Limited
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. technical advancements in judiciary. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. concerns about the conduct of advocates. (Para 3 , 4) |
| 3. violent obstruction reports. (Para 5 , 8) |
| 4. disciplinary measures against bar associations. (Para 10 , 13) |
| 5. ensuring court functioning. (Para 14 , 15) |
| 6. further status update required. (Para 16 , 17) |
1. Two affidavits have been filed before us.
3. There is, however, something more to it!
5. The matter deteriorated to a stage where the District Judge, Khurda at Bhubaneswar received reports about violent obstruction to the judicial officers, staff and litigants by members of the Bhubaneswar Bar Association restraining them in entering court building on 25.11.2022. In fact, after receiving reliable information, the District Judge had sought for police protection for judicial officers, staff and litigants. 300/400 Advocates obstructed them when staff and officers reached there and police personnel reached at about 11 a.m. But even under police protection, the Bar members prevented access by violently obstructing them. The District Judge also reported that no prior information was given to him by the Bar Association regarding such picketing on 25.11.2022.
7. There
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.