The court exercised its discretion to condone delay and dismissed the petition under Article 136 without interference, leaving law questions open.

Headnote:The court condoned the delay in hearing the case, noting that there was no sufficient ground to interfere under Article 136 of the Constitution of India and dismissed the Special Leave Petition, while leaving the question of law open for future consideration. The pending application, if any, is also deemed disposed.

Table of Content
1. delay condoned. (Para 1)
2. dismissal of petition and disposal of application. (Para 2 , 3 , 4)

1. Delay condoned.

2. No case for interference is made out in exercise of our jurisdiction under Art.136 of the Constitution of India. The Special Leave Petition is accordingly dismissed.

3. However, the question of law is kept open.

4. Pending application, if any, also stands disposed of.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

2023 Supreme(Online)(SC) 20916

SUPREME COURTAbhay S. Oka, Sanjay Karol, JJ.Pr. Commissioner of Income Tax-1 Kanpur v. Renu AggarwalS. L. P. (C) No. 13033 of 2023

The court exercised its discretion to condone delay and dismissed the petition under Article 136 without interference, leaving law questions open.

SUPREME COURT
Abhay S. Oka, Sanjay Karol, JJ.
Pr. Commissioner of Income Tax-1 Kanpur v. Renu Aggarwal
S. L. P. (C) No. 13033 of 2023