SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(SC) 10641

SUPREME COURT
, J
HP Power Transmission Corporation Limited – Appellant
Versus
M/s. Brua Hydrowatt Pvt. Ltd. – Respondent
Civil Appeal | 3919 of 2023



Liability for construction costs can only impose obligations on contracting parties, and parties not privy to an agreement cannot be held liable.

Headnote:(A) Electricity Act, 2003 - Sections 86(1)(f), 158, and 111 - Appeal against Judgment of APTEL - Liability for Bay construction cost - APTEL acknowledged BHP Ltd. liable for charges, but HPPTC Ltd. could not claim costs from Respondent No.02 and No.03 as they were not parties to the CA dated 02.07.2021. (Paras 24, 30, 31)

(B) Courts must respect privity of contract - Non-parties cannot be held liable for costs or obligations unless explicitly stated.

Facts of the case:
The HP Power Transmission Corporation Ltd. claimed that M/s Brua Hydrowatt Pvt. Ltd. is solely liable for the cost of construction for a Bay at a switching station per contractual agreements, which was disputed.

Findings of Court:
The APTEL view was flawed as it failed to acknowledge the lack of privity between BHP Ltd., and the other Respondents concerning the CA dated 02.07.2021.

Issues: Question of liability concerning contractual obligations and privity among parties.

Ratio Decidendi: The court affirmed that liability cannot be imposed on non-parties to a contract, aligning with the doctrine of privity.

Result: Appeal allowed, restoring the State Commission's order.

Table of Content
1. overview of parties and context of appeal regarding construction charges. (Para 1 , 2)
2. details on agreements evidencing liability for costs of infrastructure. (Para 3 , 4 , 5 , 6)
3. arguments about obligations and disputes over payment responsibilities. (Para 7 , 9 , 10 , 11)
4. court affirms principles of contract law regarding liability and privity. (Para 24 , 28 , 29)

1. This Civil Appeal assails the Judgment dated 17.03.2023 in Appeal No. 30 of 2023 ("Impugned Judgment") by the Appellate Tribunal for Electricity at New Delhi ("APTEL") which reversed the findings returned vide Order dated 27.12.2022, by Himachal Pradesh Electricity Regulatory Commission at Shimla (State Commission) in Petition No. 35 of 2022, holding M/s. Brua Hydrowatt Pvt. Ltd., Respondent No.01 herein ("BHP Ltd.") liable to bear the entire cost for Bay at the 66kV Switching Station at Urni ("Bay"), which was constructed by the HP Power Transmission Corporation Limited, Appellant herein ("HPPTC Ltd.") as per the Connection Agreement (Revised) dated 02.07.2021 "(CA dated 02.07.2021").

2. The details of the parties before us are that the HPPTC Ltd. is a transmission licensee responsible for executing transmission networks, including transmission lines and sub--stations of 66kV and above in the State of Himachal Pradesh. The BHP Ltd., formerly known as M/s. Contransys Pvt. Ltd., is a company incorporated under the Companies Act, 1956, and classified as a generating company under S.02(28) of the Electricity Act, 2003 . Respondent No. 02 and Respondent No. 03, being M/s. Darjeeling Power Pvt. Ltd. and M/s. Roura Non - Conventional Energy Pvt. Ltd. respectively, are the other generating companies engaged in hydroelectric projects within the State of Himachal Pradesh. Respondent No. 04 and 05 are proforma respondents, being the State Commission and State of Himachal Pradesh respectively.

3. The facts leading to the case are that Government of Himachal Pradesh entered into an Implementation Agreement with the HPPTC Ltd. on 25.07.2006 to establish the Brua Hydro Electric Project ("BHEP"), initially with a capacity of 05 MW. The interconnection was originally planned at a 33kV single circuit transmission line at Karcham in Kinnaur district of Himachal Pradesh. However, the Power Purchase Agreement dated 06.04.2009 was revised through a Supplementary Power Purchase Agreement on 09.07.2018 to increase the capacity to 09 MW at a fixed tariff of INR 2.93 per unit. The connection at Karcham was approved on 03.12.2010 by the Himachal Pradesh State Electricity Board Ltd. (HPSEBL), but stood modified to be connected at Urni instead of Karcham, allowing for the Bay in joint mode for the three generating companies i.e. BHEP, Shaung and Roura - II Hydro Power Project.

4. To this effect, an application for connectivity had been submitted by the BHP Ltd. on 04.07.2012 and stood approved by the HPPTC Ltd. on 18.03.2013 and 23.04.2013 leading to the Connection Agreement dated 04.06.2014, designating Urni as the connection point. Admittedly, the HPPTC Ltd. informed the BHP Ltd. on 04.12.2015 that Bay would only be operational after completion of the Urni - Wangtoo 66kV line and the Wangtoo sub-station. In the interregnum, it allowed BHP Ltd. to utilize the 220kV Kahshang Bhaba line circuit at 66kV. Further, in pursuance of direction of the HPSEBL, the HPPTC Ltd. completed a 66kV feeder Bay at Nathpa sub-station for interim power evacuation, leading to signing of Interim Power Transmission Agreement dated 23.01.2016, requiring the BHP Ltd. to pay INR 0.14 per unit to the HPPTC Ltd. for providing interim arrangements.

5. All three generating companies i.e., BHP Ltd., Respondent No.02 and Respondent No.03 entered into an Internal Tripartite Agreement dated 27.12.2019 (ITA dated 27.12.2019) to allow for proportionate sharing of transmission charges, including the cost of Bay installed by the HPPTC Ltd. at Urni. As per the agreement, while the BHP Ltd. would handle cla


























































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top