SUPREME COURT
unknown, unknown
Aasif @ Pasha v. State of UP
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. trial summary and charges response. (Para 3 , 4 , 5 , 6) |
| 2. denial of suspension application. (Para 7 , 8) |
| 3. judicial principles on suspension. (Para 18 , 19 , 21 , 22) |
1. Leave granted.
2. The impugned Order is one more from the High Court of Judicature at Allahabad with which we are disappointed.
3. This petition arises from the order passed by the High Court of Judicature at Allahabad dated 29/05/2025 in Criminal Appeal No.8689/2024 by which the High Court declined to suspend the substantive order of sentence passed by the Trial Court.
4. It appears from the materials on record that the appellant was put to trial in the Court of 2nd Additional Sessions Judge / Special Judge (POCSO Act), Meerut, Uttar Pradesh in Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act (POCSO) Case No.270/2016 for the offence punishable under S.7 & S.8 respectively of the POCSO Act, S.354, S.323 and S.504 respectively of the Indian Penal Code and S.3(1)(10) of the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act , 1989.
5. At the end of the trial, the appellant stood convicted.
6. He was sentenced to undergo one year rigorous imprisonment with fine of Rs.3000/- for the offen
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.