Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: Rishad Ahmed Chowdhury
For the Respondents: Mrinmoi Chatterjee, Noelle Dey Banerjee, Debojyoti Bhattacharya

Certainly. Based on the provided legal document, the key points are as follows:

1. The court emphasizes the obligation of the petitioners to fulfill their outstanding financial responsibilities promptly, including security charges and electricity charges (!) (!) .

2. The petitioners are required to deposit the outstanding amounts of Rs.85,777 towards security charges and Rs.1,17,528 towards electricity charges by 22.01.2026 (!) (!) .

3. The learned Receiver acknowledged receipt of Rs.56,000 from the petitioners for her personal expenses (!) .

4. The court directs that occupational charges must be paid in advance by the respondents, specifically by the 7th of each month, with a strict view on defaults (!) (!) .

5. The Receiver has reported increased responsibilities, necessitating additional work, and the court has fixed a monthly remuneration of Rs.30,000 for her services, payable at the end of each month (!) (!) (!) .

6. Expenses incurred by the Receiver for her duties shall be paid separately by the petitioners (!) .

7. The court has scheduled the next hearing for 11.03.2026 to further address other financial matters and the apportionment of expenses if necessary (!) (!) .

These points encapsulate the court’s directives and the financial obligations imposed on the parties involved.