IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL NO. OF 2025 (Arising out of SLP ( C) No.35017 of 2025)

@ Diary No. 62307/2025 HARISH CHAND GARG APPELLANT(S)

VERSUS SUDERSHAN KUMAR RESPONDENT(S)

O R D E R

1. Delay condoned.

2. Leave granted.

3. The appellant challenges the judgment and order dated 01.07.2025 in RCREV No.226/2018 titled “Sudershan Kumar vs. Harish Chand Garg“ passed by the High Court of Delhi at New Delhi.

4. We have heard learned counsel for the parties.

5. The appellant, through learned counsel, seeks time to hand over the vacant and peaceful possession of the demised premises to the respondent(s)/landlord(s) within a period of one year from today. Prayer accepted.

6. The appellant shall furnish an undertaking before this Court to vacate the premises on or before 30^th November,2026. The undertaking, in the usual form, shall be filed by the appellant within three weeks from today, failing which the Registry shall Signatturea Nokt Veerifi edappropriate steps.

RAJNI MUKHI Date: 2025.12.05 Reason:

7. The appellant, through learned counsel present in Court, have/has been made aware of the consequences of breach of such undertaking(s), including initiation