SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRASANNA B. VARALE, HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PANKAJ MITHAL
AMARPAL – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF UP – Respondent
602552025
REVISED ITEM NO.36 COURT NO.11 SECTION XI S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (CIVIL) Diary No(s). 60255/2025 [Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 20-05-2025 in WB No. 1585/2025 passed by the High Court of Judicature at Allahabad]
AMARPAL & ORS. Petitioner(s)
VERSUS STATE OF UP & ORS. Respondent(s)
IA No. 268959/2025 - CONDONATION OF DELAY IN FILING Date : 03-11-2025 This matter was called on for hearing today.
CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PANKAJ MITHAL HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRASANNA B. VARALE For Petitioner(s) Mr. Bipin Bihari Singh, Adv.
Mr. Anand Kumar Singh, Adv.
Mr. Ashok Anand, AOR Mr. Ajay Gupta, Adv.
For Respondent(s) :
UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following
O R D E R
1. Delay condoned.
2. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner.
3. The suit was decreed on 22.12.1992. The said decree was set aside by Sub-Division Office on 16.12.1993 treating the decree to be an ex-parte decree.
Signature Not Verified Digital4y s.igned by The aforesaid order of the Sub-Division Officer passed in 1993 KANCHAN CHOUHAN
Date: 2025.11.08
Reason:
was challenged by the petitioner in the year 2024. The Challenge was rejected on the ground of delay of more than 29 years and the
revision against the same was also dismissed. The matter was taken up in a Writ Petition before the High Court, which has also been dismissed.
5. In the facts and circumstances of the case, we do not deem it necessary to exercise our discretionary jurisdiction under Article 136 of the Constitution of India so as to revive the matter which is dead for 33 years.
6. The petitioner may contest the suit on merits.
7. Accordingly, the Special Leave Petition is dismissed.
8. Pending applications, if any, shall stand disposed of.
(KANCHAN CHOUHAN) (NIDHI MATHUR)
SENIOR PERSONAL ASSISTANT COURT MASTER (NSH)
ITEM NO.36 COURT NO.11 SECTION XI S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (CIVIL) Diary No(s). 60255/2025 [Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 20-05-2025 in WB No. 1585/2025 passed by the High Court of Judicature at Allahabad]
AMARPAL & ORS. Petitioner(s)
VERSUS STATE OF UP & ORS. Respondent(s)
IA No. 268959/2025 - CONDONATION OF DELAY IN FILING Date : 03-11-2025 This matter was called on for hearing today.
CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PANKAJ MITHAL HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRASANNA B. VARALE For Petitioner(s) Mr. Bipin Bihari Singh, Adv.
Mr. Anand Kumar Singh, Adv.
Mr. Ashok Anand, AOR Mr. Ajay Gupta, Adv.
For Respondent(s) :
UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following
O R D E R
1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner.
2. The suit was decreed on 22.12.1992. The said decree was set aside by Sub-Division Office on 16.12.1993 treating the decree to be an ex-parte decree.
3. The aforesaid order of the Sub-Division Officer passed in 1993 was challenged by the petitioner in the year 2024. The Challenge was rejected on the ground of delay of more than 29 years and the revision against the same was also dismissed. The matter was taken up in a Writ Petition before the High Court, which has also been dismissed.
4. In the facts and circumstances of the case, we do not deem it necessary to exercise our discretionary jurisdiction under Article 136 of the Constitution of India so as to revive the matter which is dead for 33 years.
5. The petitioner may contest the suit on merits.
6. Accordingly, the Special Leave Petition is dismissed.
7. Pending applications, if any, shall stand disposed of.
(KANCHAN CHOUHAN) (NIDHI MATHUR)
SENIOR PERSONAL ASSISTANT COURT MASTER (NSH)
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.