SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AUGUSTINE GEORGE MASIH, HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE DIPANKAR DATTA
TUSHAR – Appellant
Versus
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA – Respondent
613032025
Corrected*
ITEM NO.14 COURT NO.9 SECTION II-A S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (CRIMINAL) Diary No(s). 61303/2025 [Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 20-03-2025 in BA No. 380/2025 passed by the High Court of Judicature at Bombay at Aurangabad]
TUSHAR & ANR. Petitioner(s)
VERSUS THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA & ANR. Respondent(s)
IA No. 272279/2025 - CONDONATION OF DELAY IN FILING IA No. 272281/2025 - EXEMPTION FROM FILING C/C OF THE IMPUGNED
JUDGMENT
IA No. 272283/2025 - EXEMPTION FROM FILING O.T.
Date : 07-11-2025 This matter was called on for hearing today.
CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE DIPANKAR DATTA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AUGUSTINE GEORGE MASIH For Petitioner(s) :Mr. Nishant Ramakantrao Katneshwarkar, AOR Mr. Vijay Singh, Adv.
Mr. Shrirang Katneshwarkar, Adv.
Mr. Aadideo Kumar Verma, Adv.
For Respondent(s) :Mr. Anand Dilip Landge, AOR Mr. Sudhir Zambare, Adv.
Mrs. Sangeeta Nenwani, Adv.
Ms. Revati Pravin Kharde, Adv.
Mr. Shreenivas Patil, Adv.
Mr. Rahul Prakash Pathak, Adv.
UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following
O R D E R
1. Delay condoned.
2. The de facto complainant (Ramchandra Uttam Sable) will be arrayed as Signarturee Nsot Vperiofiedndent no.3 in this special leave petition.
JATINDER KAUR Date: 2025.11.28
1 R 5 e : a 3 s 2 o : 3 4 n 1 : . IST Issue notice, returnable on 17th December, 2025.
4. Respondent no.1-State of Maharashtra may file its counter affidavit at least 48 hours prior to the returnable date. Such affidavit ought to include, inter alia, the following:
(i) Particulars of chargesheet, if filed;
(ii) Number of witnesses proposed to be examined by the prosecution;
(iii) Whether charge has been framed or not;
(iv) If the charge has not been framed or the trial has not commenced, as the case may be, the reason therefor;
(v) If the trial has commenced, the number of witnesses examined;
and (vi) Any other information relevant for a decision on the special leave petition.
5. Respondent no.3 may also file its counter affidavit within three weeks from date.
6. Be it recorded that the special leave petition shall not be pressed on behalf of the petitioner no.2, as submitted by Mr. Katneshwarkar, learned counsel appearing for the petitioners. Accordingly, the name of the petitioner*
no.2 ‘Pravin’ will stand deleted from the array of petitioners.
7. Cause title be amended accordingly, within a week.
(JATINDER KAUR) (SUDHIR KUMAR SHARMA)
P.S. to REGISTRAR COURT MASTER (NSH)
ITEM NO.14 COURT NO.9 SECTION II-A S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (CRIMINAL) Diary No(s). 61303/2025 [Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 20-03-2025 in BA No. 380/2025 passed by the High Court of Judicature at Bombay at Aurangabad]
TUSHAR & ANR. Petitioner(s)
VERSUS THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA & ANR. Respondent(s)
IA No. 272279/2025 - CONDONATION OF DELAY IN FILING IA No. 272281/2025 - EXEMPTION FROM FILING C/C OF THE IMPUGNED
JUDGMENT
IA No. 272283/2025 - EXEMPTION FROM FILING O.T.
Date : 07-11-2025 This matter was called on for hearing today.
CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE DIPANKAR DATTA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AUGUSTINE GEORGE MASIH For Petitioner(s) :Mr. Nishant Ramakantrao Katneshwarkar, AOR Mr. Vijay Singh, Adv.
Mr. Shrirang Katneshwarkar, Adv.
Mr. Aadideo Kumar Verma, Adv.
For Respondent(s) :Mr. Anand Dilip Landge, AOR Mr. Sudhir Zambare, Adv.
Mrs. Sangeeta Nenwani, Adv.
Ms. Revati Pravin Kharde, Adv.
Mr. Shreenivas Patil, Adv.
Mr. Rahul Prakash Pathak, Adv.
UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following
O R D E R
1. Delay condoned.
2. The de facto complainant (Ramchandra Uttam Sable) will be arrayed as respondent no.3 in this special leave petition.
3. Issue notice, returnable on 17th December, 2025.
4. Respondent no.1-State of Maharashtra may file its counter affidavit at least 48 hours prior to the returnable date. Such affidavit ought to include, inter alia, the following:
(i) Particulars of chargesheet, if filed;
(ii) Number of witnesses proposed t
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.