SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(SC) 111359

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.M. SUNDRESH, HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SATISH CHANDRA SHARMA
MAHAMMED SHIYAB – Appellant
Versus
NATIONAL INVESTIGATION AGENCY – Respondent
456692025



REVISED ITEM NO.31 COURT NO.6 SECTION II-E S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (CRIMINAL) Diary No(s). 45669/2025 [Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 26-04-2025 in WP No. 6551/2025 passed by the High Court of Karnataka at Bengaluru]

MAHAMMED SHIYAB Petitioner(s)

VERSUS NATIONAL INVESTIGATION AGENCY & ORS. Respondent(s)

IA No. 236321/2025 - CONDONATION OF DELAY IN FILING IA No. 236317/2025 - EXEMPTION FROM FILING O.T.

WITH Diary No(s). 45939/2025 (II-E)

IA No. 239459/2025 - CONDONATION OF DELAY IN FILING IA No. 239458/2025 - EXEMPTION FROM FILING O.T.

Date : 06-10-2025 These matters were called on for hearing today.

CORAM :

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.M. SUNDRESH HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SATISH CHANDRA SHARMA For Petitioner(s) Dr. Aditya Sondhi, Sr. Adv.

Mr. Talha Abdul Rahman, AOR Mr. M Shaz Khan, Adv.

Mr. Sudhanshu Tewari, Adv.

Mr. Anubhav Kumar, Adv.

Mr. Faizan Ahmed, Adv. Mr. Rafid Akhter, Adv.

For Respondent(s)

UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following

O R D E R

SLP (CRIMINAL) Diary No(s). 45669/2025 Signature Not Verified Delay condoned.

ASHA SUNDRIYAL Date: 2025.10.17 Reason:

order passed by the High Court.

However, we make it clear that the observations made by the High Court with respect to the fresh sanction may not be required for deciding the lis. Therefore, the said observations will have no bearing on the further proceedings.

Accordingly, the said issue is left open.

The Special Leave Petition is, accordingly, disposed of.

Pending application(s), if any, shall also stand disposed of.

Diary No(s). 45939/2025 In view of the delay in filing the Special Leave Petition, we are not inclined to interfere with the impugned order.

However, we grant liberty to the petitioner to file a fresh application, in which case the Trial Court shall decide the same on its own merits without being influenced by its earlier order or the impugned order passed by the High Court.

The Special Leave Petition stands dismissed both on delay as well as on merits.

Pending application(s), if any, shall also stand disposed of.

(ASHA SUNDRIYAL) (POONAM VAID)

DEPUTY REGISTRAR ASSISTANT REGISTRAR ITEM NO.31 COURT NO.6 SECTION II-E S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (CRIMINAL) Diary No(s). 45669/2025 [Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 26-04-2025 in WP No. 6551/2025 passed by the High Court of Karnataka at Bengaluru]

MAHAMMED SHIYAB Petitioner(s)

VERSUS NATIONAL INVESTIGATION AGENCY & ORS. Respondent(s)

IA No. 236321/2025 - CONDONATION OF DELAY IN FILING IA No. 236317/2025 - EXEMPTION FROM FILING O.T.

WITH Diary No(s). 45939/2025 (II-E)

IA No. 239459/2025 - CONDONATION OF DELAY IN FILING IA No. 239458/2025 - EXEMPTION FROM FILING O.T.

Date : 06-10-2025 These matters were called on for hearing today.

CORAM :

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.M. SUNDRESH HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SATISH CHANDRA SHARMA For Petitioner(s) Dr. Aditya Sondhi, Sr. Adv.

Mr. Talha Abdul Rahman, AOR Mr. M Shaz Khan, Adv.

Mr. Sudhanshu Tewari, Adv.

Mr. Anubhav Kumar, Adv.

Mr. Faizan Ahmed, Adv. Mr. Rafid Akhter, Adv.

For Respondent(s)

UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following

O R D E R

SLP (CRIMINAL) Diary No(s). 45669/2025 Delay condoned.

We find no reason to interfere with the impugned order passed by the High Court.

However, we make it clear that the observations made by the High Court with respect to the fresh application may not be required for deciding the lis. Therefore, the said observations will have no bearing on the further proceedings.

Accordingly, the said issue is left open.

The Special Leave Petition is, accordingly, disposed of.

Pending application(s), if any, shall also stand disposed of.

Diary No(s). 45939/2025 In view of the delay in filing the Special Leave Petition, we are not inclined to interfere with the impugned order.

However, we grant liberty to the petitioner to file a fresh application, in which case the Trial Court shall decide the same on its own merits without being in

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top