SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2004 Supreme(Online)(SC) 132

SUPREME COURT
, , JJ
Commissioner of Central Excise Ahmedabad v. M/s Susma Textile Pvt. Ltd.


Table of Content
1. classification of bleached cotton fabrics for duty. (Para 1 , 2 , 3)
2. arguments surrounding the classification headings. (Para 4 , 5 , 6)
3. understanding of 'buckram' in fabric classification. (Para 7 , 8 , 9 , 10)
4. permanent stiffness necessity for classification. (Para 11 , 12)
5. dismissal of appeal based on findings. (Para 13)

1. The question that falls for consideration in this batch of cases is as to the classification of the bleached sheeting which is heavily sized and manufactured by each of the respondents and whether the same falls under Heading 52.06 of the Central Excise Tariff Act, 1985 [for short 'the Act'] or under Heading 59.01 as sought by them.

2. The respondents are engaged in the manufacture of cotton fabrics which is stiff and heavily sized with starch gum and inorganic fillers. The respondents classified this product under Heading 52.06 by declaring their product as subjected to the process of bleaching and finishing. However, later on, when the Department inspected the unit of the respondents, they thought that the product in question will have to be classified under Heading 59.01. Sample of the product was taken for testing and the repor


















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top