Back
SUPREME COURT
D.Y. Chandrachud, A.S. Bopanna, JJ
Union of India, Ministry of Mines – Appellant
Versus
State of Karnataka – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. review petition filed by the union of india regarding a previous judgment. (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 , 5 , 6) |
| 2. discussion on the misquoted expert committee's report. (Para 16 , 17 , 18 , 19 , 20) |
| 3. review jurisdiction limitations on interpretation and errors. (Para 21 , 22 , 23 , 24 , 25) |
| 4. final order dismissing the review petition. (Para 29 , 30 , 31) |
1. This review petition has been filed by the Union of India, Ministry of Mines, seeking review of the judgment and order dated 13.09.2010 passed in Sandur Manganese & Iron Ores Ltd. v. State of Karnataka and Others, 2010 (13) SCC 1 (Civil Appeal No. 7944 of 2010 and Civil Appeal Nos. 7945-54 and 7955-61 of 2010).
2. In Sandur (supra), this Court had interpreted various provisions of the Mines and Minerals (Development and Regulation) Act, 1957 (in short “the MMDR Act”) and the Mineral Concession Rules, 1960 (in short “the MC Rules”) framed thereunder. It is the grievance of the petitioner herein that this review is instituted since the Ministry of Mines, Government of India, could not put forth its view on the interpretation of the provisions of the MMDR Act in Sandur (supra) for the reason that the copy of the special
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
