Back
SUPREME COURT
Justices, J
workman – Appellant
Versus
Bangalore Metropolitan Transport Corporation – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. case initiated due to disciplinary charges against workman. (Para 2 , 3 , 4 , 5) |
| 2. arguments regarding the fairness of punishment in light of similar cases. (Para 6 , 7) |
| 3. observation of judicial delays and penalties leading to discrimination. (Para 8 , 9 , 10) |
| 4. discussion on jurisdiction and limitations of judicial review in employment disputes. (Para 11 , 12 , 13 , 14) |
| 5. final judgment restoring labour court's decision. (Para 15 , 16) |
1. Leave granted.
2. This appeal by special leave arises out of the judgment dated 3.9.2012 passed by the High Court of Karnataka, in and by which, the High Court dismissed the appeal filed by the appellant - workman thereby, confirming the termination of the appellant.
3. Brief facts which led to the filing of this appeal are as under: - The appellant was appointed on the post of Driver in the Bangalore Metropolitan Transport Corporation on 3.9.1985 and was working on the same post since then. The appellant was served with article of charge dated 3.9.1990 alleging that he had secured appointment by producing a false transfer certificate. An enquiry was initiated on 15.7.1992 and the appellant submitted his explanation to the afo
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
