SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2015 Supreme(Online)(SC) 588

SUPREME COURT
, J
Sundaram Finance Limited (M/s.) and Another v. T. Thankam


Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners:
For the Respondents: None

Table of Content
1. dispute concerning possession and injunction related to asset. (Para 2 , 3 , 4)
2. jurisdiction of civil court regarding arbitration agreements. (Para 5 , 10 , 11 , 12)
3. court's obligation to refer cases to arbitration. (Para 14 , 15 , 16)

1. Leave granted.

2. Once an application is duly filed in terms of S.8 of The Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (hereinafter referred to as 'Arbitration Act') before the civil court, what should be the approach of the court, is the short question arising for consideration in this case.

3. In a suit for injunction filed by the respondent, the prayer made was to restrain the first and second defendant institutions and their men from illegally taking away from the possession of plaintiff or her employee, or interfering with the use and enjoyment of ambassador or causing damage to the car bearing registration number KL - 11 - AA - 1473 in the ownership and possession of the plaintiff by way of a decree of injunction. The car was purchased on loan granted by the appellant.

4. Duly complying with the procedure under S.8 of the Arbitration Act, the appellant filed an application bringing to the notice of the trial court that in vie



















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top