SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2016 Supreme(Online)(SC) 763

SUPREME COURT
Judge name, J
DDA – Appellant
Versus
M/s Anant Raj Agencies Pvt. Ltd. – Respondent
RSA No. 6 of 1983



Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: Ashwani Kumar
For the Respondents: C.S. Vaidyanathan

Acceptance of rent post-lease expiration does not imply lease renewal; unauthorized occupancy arises without formal renewal, supporting the authority's right to reclaim property and damages.

Headnote:(A) Delhi Development Act, 1957 - Sections 21 and 22 - Public Premises (Eviction of Unauthorised Occupants) Act, 1971 - Lease and its renewal - Acceptance of rent after expiry of lease does not amount to renewal of lease; DDA's termination of lease found to be valid despite rent acceptance by original lessee. (Para 35)

(B) Leasehold Rights - The lease of property becomes unauthorized occupancy without renewal as per lease conditions even if rent is paid; lease rights are not assignable if no renewal is in place. (Para 34)

(C) Public interest - The courts must ensure public property is not unlawfully occupied; damages for unauthorized occupation can be claimed by the authority. (Para 34)

Facts of the case:
The DDA terminated the lease of a property due to breaches by the original lessee, leading to litigation over the validity of termination and claims of lease renewal based on subsequent rent payments.

Findings of Court:
Courts below erred in holding the lease renewed due to rent acceptance; the lease expired, resulting in unauthorized occupation.

Issues: Whether rent acceptance constitutes lease renewal and the implications of unauthorized occupancy post-lease expiration.

Ratio Decidendi: Courts reiterated that mere acceptance of rent post-lease does not indicate renewal; DDA’s termination notice was legally sound as per lease agreement and statutory provisions.

Result: Appeal allowed; DDA is entitled to reclaim possession and damages for unauthorized occupation.

Table of Content
1. facts of the property lease and history. (Para 2 , 3 , 4 , 5 , 6 , 7 , 8 , 9 , 10)
2. arguments from the dda regarding lease breaches. (Para 12 , 13 , 14 , 15 , 16 , 17 , 18 , 19 , 20)
3. court's consideration of key legal issues. (Para 21 , 22 , 23)
4. court's analysis and application of law. (Para 24 , 25 , 26 , 27 , 28 , 29 , 30 , 31 , 32)
5. conclusion and final order of the court. (Para 33 , 34 , 35)

1. Leave granted.

2. This appeal by special leave is directed against the impugned judgment and order dated 31.05.2011 passed by the High Court of Delhi at New Delhi in RSA No. 6 of 1983, wherein the High Court has dismissed the second appeal filed by the appellant - Authority (hereinafter called " DDA ") holding that acceptance of rent, in the instant case, by the pursuant to a demand made by it amounts to a renewal of lease in respect of the property in question.

3. Brief facts are stated hereunder to appreciate the rival legal contentions urged on behalf of the parties:
The Delhi Improvement Trust vide lease deed dated 06.01.1951 granted lease of plot no.2, Jhandewalan, "E" Block, Delhi in favour of original lessee Balraj Virmani. After enactment of the Delhi Development Act, 1957 , the DDA was constituted by notification of the Central Government and by virtue of S.60 of the aforesaid Act, all properties, movable or immovable, vested in the Delhi Improvement Trust came to be vested in the .

4. The lease in respect of property in question was initially for a period of 20 years i.e., w.e.f. 11.08.1948 to 10.08.1968 and the same was liable to be extended for a further period of 20 years at the option of lessee in accordance with the terms and conditions contained therein. Clause (vi) of the lease deed is a relevant condition, which reads as under:
"vi) not to use the said land and buildings that may be erected thereon during the said term for any other purpose other than for the purpose of cold storage plant without the consent in writing of the said lessor; provided that the lease shall become void if the land is used for any purpose other than that for which the lease is granted not beinga purpose subsequently approved by the lessor".
Clause III(b) is another relevant condition which reads thus:
"III(b) in case this lease with the lessee shall continue for the said period of 20 years and provided the lessee has observed performed and complied with the terms and covenants, conditions and options to renew the lease on such terms and conditions as the lessor deems fit for further period of 20 years, provided that the notice of the intention of the lessee to exercise this option of renewal is given to the lessor six months before the expiration of the lease; provided further that if the lease is extended for a further period 20 years the lessor shall have the right to enhance the rental upto 50% at the original rent."



5. On 23.02.1967, the original lessee approached the DDA for renewal of his lease. The served a show cause notice dated 16.02.1968 to the original lessee for breach of the terms and conditions contained in the lease deed committed by him with respect to the lease. Following breaches were pointed out in the aforesaid show cause notice:
a. The mezzanine floor of the said building being used for printing press and office purposes by different tenants in contravention of the clause 1(vi) and (vii) of the lease deed.
b. Cold storage has been sublet to M/s. Baikunth cold storage since December, 1965 in contravention of clause 1(vii) of the lease deed.
c. Portion of mezzanine floor being used for residential purposes by the cold storage staff in contravention of clause 1(xv) of the lease deed.
d. Only single storey building stands on the plot in place of four storied building in contravention of clause 1(xv)(c) of the lease deed.
By the said notice, 15 days time was given to the original lessee to remedy the breaches as pointed out in the show cause notice. The original lessee replied to the said show cause notice



























































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top