SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2017 Supreme(Online)(SC) 1645

SUPREME COURT
A, J
State represented by its Principal Secretary to Government, Home (Police XIX) Department and others – Appellant
Versus
Global Capital Trading Services – Respondent


Table of Content
1. outline the facts and background leading to the appeal. (Para 2 , 3 , 4)
2. discuss the arguments from both sides regarding the ad-interim order. (Para 6 , 9)
3. examine statutory provisions and interpretations impacting the case. (Para 10 , 12 , 14)
4. conclude with the court's findings and decision to allow the appeal. (Para 15 , 16 , 17)

1. Leave granted.

3. Brief facts of the case which are necessary for adjudication of dispute before us are, on 01.11.2010, a complaint was registered with Deputy Superintendent of Police against the respondents herein alleging that, respondents were conjointly running a Financial Establishment in the name of Global Capital Trading Services at Madurai, offering high rate of returns on investments in their Financial Establishment. Basing on the assurance given by the respondents herein, the complainant along with his relatives deposited huge sums of money with the Financial Establishment, administered by the respondents herein. Furthermore it is alleged that respondent No. 1 has returned back only a part of the deposited amount to the complainant and thereafter absconded. In light of the above averred facts, complaint was registered



















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top