SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2019 Supreme(Online)(SC) 3016

SUPREME COURT
Unknown, J
Delhi Development Authority v. Nalwa Sons Investment Limited and Another
LPA No. 735 of 2012 | Writ Petition (Civil) No. 1885 of 2011



Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: Ms Binu Tamta
For the Respondents: Mr Jayant Bhushan

A transfer of leasehold property via demerger constitutes a transaction liable for payment of unearned increase, notwithstanding the absence of sale consideration, as upheld by the terms outlined in the perpetual lease deed.

Headnote:(A) Companies Act, 1956 - Section 394(2) - Lease Deed - Clause 6(a) - Transfer of the leasehold property due to demerger - Obligation to pay 50% unearned increase chargeable despite no sale consideration involved - Legal enforceability of lease agreements prevails. (Paras 1, 2, 6, 21)

(B) Taxation - Unearned Increase - Conditions under which unearned increase will be chargeable including situations involving corporate group transitions - Transfers and liabilities established by clause interpretation. (Paras 10, 18)

(C) Corporate Law - Definition of transfer in proprietary rights - Demerger recognized as a transfer of assets attracting payment stipulations. (Paras 14, 16)

Facts of the case:
Respondent 1, a public limited company, was leased land on which they undertook a demerger, transferring the plot to another public limited company. Post-demerger, the appellant sought payment of unearned increase based on the lease terms.

Findings of Court:
The original lessee remains liable for unearned increase due to lease conditions triggered by the demerger process.

Issues: Whether the respondents are liable to pay unearned increase post-demerger when the transaction does not involve outside parties or consideration?

Ratio Decidendi: The court affirmed that the demerger constituted a transfer of the leasehold property subject to the original lease obligations, including the payment of unearned increase as specified in the lease agreement.

Result: The appeal is allowed, setting aside the decision of the Division Bench, restoring the Single Judge's order demanding payment of unearned increase.

1. Leave granted. The seminal question involved in the present appeal is : If the original lessee (Respondent 1, a public limited company) in respect of the plot given on lease by the appellant, transfers the same to another public limited company, albeit an alter ego of the former, consequent to an order of arrangement and demerger passed by the Company Judge, then whether it is liable to pay 50% unearned increase ("UEI") on the market value of the plot to the appellant (lessor)?

2. Briefly stated, in an auction conducted by the appellant, Respondent 1 (former name Jindal Strips Ltd.) was allotted a commercial plot in Bhikaji Cama Place, New Delhi, on 233-1993. Possession of the plot was handed over to Respondent 1 on 6-9-1993 and a perpetual lease deed dated 28-9-1993, was executed by the appellant in favour of Respondent 1. It is apposite to reproduce stipulation 6(a) of the said lease deed, which reads thus:
"6. (a) The lessee shall not sell, transfer, assign or otherwise part with the possession of the whole or any part of the commercial plot except with the previous consent in writing of the lessor which he shall be entitled to refuse in his absolute discretion.
provided that in the event of the consent being given, the lessor may impose such terms and conditions as he thinks fit and the lessor shall be entitled to claim and recover a portion of the unearned increase in the value (i.e. the difference between the premium paid and the market value) of the commercial plot at the time of sale, transfer, assignment, or parting with the possession, the amount to be recovered being fifty per cent of the unearned increase and the decision of the lessor in respect of the market value shall be final and binding:
provided further that the lessor shall have the pre - emptive right to purchase the whole property or any part thereof that may be subject of sale, transfer, assignment or otherwise parting with the possession as the case may be, after deduction of fifty per cent of the unearned increase as aforesaid.
provided further that notwithstanding the limitations and conditions as mentioned in Clause 6(a), the lessee may sell or transfer the floor space constructed on the plot subject to the permission of the lessor in writing on payment of Rs 100 for each flat / floor space for the first sale / transfer, for subsequent sale / transfer the lessor may on payment of proportionate 50% of the unearned increase (i.e. the difference between the premium already paid by the purchase / transferor and the market price of the time of sale transfer towards the portion of the land) grant permission to the sub- lessee / transferor for such subsequent sale / transfer of the floor space to be transferred. Prior permission of the lessor for such second and subsequent sale / transfer of floor space shall be subject to the conditions of getting the deed of apartment and the sublease (as defined under the Delhi Apartment Ownership Act, 1986) executed by the lessee in favour of such floor space buyers / transferee.
provided further that the lessee shall be required to intimate the first list of the floor space buyer / transferees giving full details of name, address and quantum of floor space to the lessor, simultaneously with the grant of completion certificate. However, completion certificate shall be issued only on furnishing the valid list of first purchaser of floor space along with copies of deed of apartment duly executed with each one of them. The grant of permission by the lessor to the lessee for transfer of floor space or subsequent transfer of floor space to another person, shall not absolve the lessee from violation of the terms & conditions of the lease. The lessee shall also be responsible for making all arrangements as are necessary for maintenance of the building including but without limitation affecting the fire fighting system and the common services."
(emphasis supplied)






3. Respondent 1 and Respondent 2 entered into an arrangement and invi














































































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top