SUPREME COURT
Ajay Rastogi, J
C & C Constructions Ltd. (M/s.) v. IRCON International Ltd.
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. relevant facts of the case and procedural history. (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 , 5 , 6) |
| 2. submissions by the appellant and respondent regarding claims. (Para 10 , 11) |
| 3. court's observations on the applicability of limitations set by clause 49.5. (Para 12 , 22 , 23 , 24 , 25 , 26) |
| 4. decision on the appeal based on established legal principles. (Para 29) |
1. This appeal arises out of the impugned judgment and order of the Division Bench of the High Court of Delhi dated 1st March, 2021, which is passed in an appeal under S.37 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (for short, 'the Arbitration Act').
2. We refer to a few factual aspects of the case. An agreement dated 28th June, 2012 was entered into between the appellant and the respondent for constructing five Road Over Bridges (for short, 'ROBs') and their approaches at different locations in the State of Rajasthan. The schedule of completion in respect of each ROB was different. The locations where ROBs were to be constructed have been described as LC - 200, LC - 89, LC - 228, LC - 233 and LC - 108. According to the appellant's case, the work at the sites was delayed for the reasons attributable to the respondent.


Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.