SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(SC) 111468

SUPREME COURT
Surya Kant, N. Kotiswar Singh, JJ.
Himanshu Singh v. Union of India
Various Petitions



Systematic failures by statutory authorities and financial institutions caused financial duress on homebuyers, warranting investigation.

Headnote:(A) Consumer Protection Laws - Systematic failure of statutory authorities leading to financial duress on homebuyers - Issues raised against builders, banks, and financial institutions regarding payments and regulations. (Paras 1-4)

(B) Investigative Authority - Directions for investigation by CBI into nexus among builders and financial institutions - Preliminary Enquiries suggested to ascertain legal liabilities. (Paras 5-10)

Facts of the case:
A significant number of petitions filed by homebuyers highlight failures by builders and banks related to loan agreements, particularly involving subvention schemes that did not yield promised possession of properties. Investigations were initiated after aggrieved parties failed to secure relief from lower courts.

Findings of Court:
CBI is directed to register seven Preliminary Enquiries to examine alleged collusions and irregularities in financial dealings involving multiple builders and banks.

Issues: The main issues focus on the regulatory failures, rights of the homebuyers, and the culpability of financial entities in breach of agreements and laws.

Ratio Decidendi: The court emphasizes the necessity of investigations into the relationship and dealings between financial institutions and builders to ensure justice to homebuyers who suffered due to contractual failures.

Result: CBI to initiate Preliminary Enquiries and provide comprehensive reports.

Table of Content
1. systematic failure of statutory authorities impacting homebuyers. (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4)
2. investigation into the nexus between builders and financial institutions. (Para 5 , 6 , 7 , 8)
3. cbi to ensure proper investigation and reporting. (Para 9 , 19 , 22)
4. need for preliminary enquiries by cbi. (Para 10 , 12)
5. court directives for interim protection and cooperative efforts. (Para 11 , 15 , 16 , 18 , 21 , 23 , 24 , 25 , 26 , 27 , 28 , 29 , 30 , 31)

1. This batch of cases, comprising more than 170 petitions have been filed by over 1200 homebuyers / borrowers. They have raised an issue of paramount importance re: the systematic failure of statutory and government authorities to discharge their functions, circumvention of regulatory framework by Banks and Housing Financial Corporations, and the resultant illicit benefits said to have been drawn by builders / developers at the cost of the homebuyers, who are now bearing the brunt of such failures.

2. The common background of each of these matters, as noted by this Court on 04.03.2025 also, is that the builders / developers advertised the 'subvention schemes' assuring payment of the EMI / pre - EMI(s) of the home - loans taken by the homebuyers to purchase the units in their projects till a specified cut - off date or till the date of delivery of possession. The scheme was implemented in most cases by taking loans through a tripartite agreement among the bank / financial institution, homebuyer(s), and the builder / developer. While these projects were launched in the years 2013-2015, most of the builder / developers started defaulting in payment of EMIs in the years 2018-2019. Resultantly, the banks began to demand payments from the homebuyers, and consequential failure to make the payments led to the coercive actions against the homebuyers, despite the units being incomplete and there being no occasion to offer possession.

3. Some of the aggrieved homebuyers approached the High Court of Delhi, and having failed to get the desired relief, they have approached this Court under Art.136, while some others have invoked the writ jurisdiction of this Court for similar reliefs.

4. When the matter came up for hearing on 05.11.2024, this Court directed the parties to furnish the detailed information relating to the following aspects:
"(i) The status and details of the payments made by the builder - cum - developers to the financial institutions or such payments made by the home - buyers to the financial institutions / builder - cum - developers.
(ii) The date of offering possession to the home - buyers, where the project is stated to have been completed.
(iii) The current status of completion of the project, including the details of the Completion Certificate and other statutory certificates granted by the prescribed authorities, along with details of the possession given or offered to the home - buyers.
(iv) The status of recovery from the home - buyers, namely, whether they have made EMI payments to the banks or not.
(v) The amenities advertised by the builder - cum - developers at the time of launching the project and the status re: completion thereof.
(vi) The status as to whether the builder - cum - developers has undergone CIRP (under IBC) or any other coercive or non - coercive recovery procedure, and the stage of such proceedings.
(vii) Whether the home - buyers have received any relief or remedial order from the statutory authorities like Real Estate Regulatory Authority (RERA). If so, the details of such orders be also furnished





."

5. On receipt of that information, this Court, on 04.03.2025, prima facie found that there was some unholy nexus between the banks / Housing Financial Corporations on one hand and the builder - cum - developers on the other. It was in this context that the Central Bureau of Investigation was asked to be represented on the next date of hearing.

6. On 18.03.2025, learned Additional Solicitor General of India, along with some officers of the CBI, was












































































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top