SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(SC) 208

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
N/A, N/A
Yandra Sneha Satyanarayana – Appellant
Versus
Mataparthi Ramesh – Respondent
TRANSFER PETITION (CIVIL) NO.382/2024



Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: N/A
For the Respondents: N/A

Court discretion in transferring cases to promote judicial efficiency based on parties' pending matters.

Headnote:In this case, the Supreme Court addressed the petitioner-wife's request to transfer petition H.M.O.P. No. 225 of 2023, from Eluru to Chandrapur, due to pending matters between the parties. The Court noted that mediation was unsuccessful and determined that transferring the case would serve justice. Critical aspects included the need for efficiency in legal proceedings and convenience to the involved parties. The Court granted the transfer petition, directing records to be sent promptly to the transferee Court.

ORDER

1. The present transfer petition has been filed by the petitioner-wife seeking transfer of a petition initiated at the instance of the respondent-husband bearing H.M.O.P. bearing No. 225 of 2023, titled as “Mattaparthi Ramesh Vs. Yandra Sneha Satyanaryana”(subject-case), pending in the Court of Additional Senior Civil Judge, Eluru, Andhra Pradesh to the Court of Civil Judge, Senior Division, Chandrapur, Maharashtra.

2. Heard learned counsel for the parties.

3. The matter between the parties was referred to the Supreme Court Mediation Centre vide this Court’s order dated 25.09.2025 but the matter could not be settled.

4. Considering the fact that other case(s) between the parties are pending in the Court at Chandrapur, Maharashtra, it would be expedient in the ends of justice to transfer the subject-case as asked for by the petitioner-wife.

5. The Court where proceedings are pending is directed to send the records to the transferee Court promptly and without any delay.

6. The Transfer Petition stands allowed accordingly.

7. If video conferencing facility is available with the transferee Court, the benefit of the same shall be made available to the parties. They need not appear physically on each date unless their physical presence is absolutely necessary.

8. A copy of this order be sent to the concerned courts for compliance.

9. Pending application(s), if any, shall stand disposed of.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top