2026 Supreme(Online)(SC) 213
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
MR. MANMOHAN, MR. VIPUL M. PANCHOLI, JJ
THE STATE OF HIMACHAL PRADESH & ANR. – Appellant
Versus
SATISH KUMAR & ORS. – Respondent
Civil Appeal No(s). 10021/2025
Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: Mr. Nidhesh Gupta, Sr. Adv., Mr. Abhinav Agrawal, AOR, Mr. Rajesh Kumar, Adv., Mr. Piyush Bhardwaj, Adv., Mr. Shivam Sengupta, Adv.
For the Respondents: Mr. J.s.attri, Sr. Adv., Mr. Chandra Nand Jha, Adv., Mr. Rameshwar Prasad Goyal, AOR, Mr. S. Gowthaman, AOR, Mr. Ravi Bakshi, Adv., Mr. Manvendra Pratap Singh, Adv., Mr. Rajnesh Gaur, Adv., Mr. Saksham Thareja, Adv., Mr. Kumar Vinayak, Adv., Mr. P.s. Patwalia, Sr. Adv., Ms. Natasha Dalmia, AOR, Ms. Anisha Jain, Adv., Ms. Shambhavi Singh, Adv., Ms. Prerna Cheema, Adv., Mr. Abhinav Agrawal, AOR, Mr. S N Bhat, Sr. Adv., Mr. D P Chaturvedi, Adv., Mr. Tarun Kumar Thakur, Adv., Mr. Abhay Choudhary M, Adv., Mr. Savyasachi, Adv., Ms. Anuradha Mutatkar, AOR, Mr. Varad Dwivedi, Adv., Ms. Sadhana Sandhu, AOR, Ms. Pratima Singh, Adv., Ms. Sukriti Chauhan, Adv., Mr. Arjun Chaudhary, Adv.
Court adjourning the matter for future hearing due to Advocate's personal difficulties.
Headnote:The Supreme Court conducts proceedings regarding Civil Appeal No. 10021/2025 involving the State of Himachal Pradesh (appellant) and Satish Kumar (respondent). The case is adjourned to 11.03.2026 as the Advocate General for the appellant is unable to argue due to personal difficulties. The primary issue raised relates to legal representation. Consequently, it is deemed just to continue the listing for further argument.
ORDER
1. Learned counsel for the appellants states that the learned Advocate General for the State of Himachal Pradesh, who is to argue the matter, is in personal difficulty.
2. In the interest of justice, list on 11.03.2026.
Click Here to Read the rest of this document
Back
