SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(SC) 213

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
MR. MANMOHAN, MR. VIPUL M. PANCHOLI, JJ
THE STATE OF HIMACHAL PRADESH & ANR. – Appellant
Versus
SATISH KUMAR & ORS. – Respondent


Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: Mr. Nidhesh Gupta, Sr. Adv., Mr. Abhinav Agrawal, AOR, Mr. Rajesh Kumar, Adv., Mr. Piyush Bhardwaj, Adv., Mr. Shivam Sengupta, Adv.
For the Respondents: Mr. J.s.attri, Sr. Adv., Mr. Chandra Nand Jha, Adv., Mr. Rameshwar Prasad Goyal, AOR, Mr. S. Gowthaman, AOR, Mr. Ravi Bakshi, Adv., Mr. Manvendra Pratap Singh, Adv., Mr. Rajnesh Gaur, Adv., Mr. Saksham Thareja, Adv., Mr. Kumar Vinayak, Adv., Mr. P.s. Patwalia, Sr. Adv., Ms. Natasha Dalmia, AOR, Ms. Anisha Jain, Adv., Ms. Shambhavi Singh, Adv., Ms. Prerna Cheema, Adv., Mr. Abhinav Agrawal, AOR, Mr. S N Bhat, Sr. Adv., Mr. D P Chaturvedi, Adv., Mr. Tarun Kumar Thakur, Adv., Mr. Abhay Choudhary M, Adv., Mr. Savyasachi, Adv., Ms. Anuradha Mutatkar, AOR, Mr. Varad Dwivedi, Adv., Ms. Sadhana Sandhu, AOR, Ms. Pratima Singh, Adv., Ms. Sukriti Chauhan, Adv., Mr. Arjun Chaudhary, Adv.

ORDER

1. Learned counsel for the appellants states that the learned Advocate General for the State of Himachal Pradesh, who is to argue the matter, is in personal difficulty.

2. In the interest of justice, list on 11.03.2026.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top