2026 Supreme(Online)(SC) 221
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
AHSANUDDIN AMANULLAH, R. MAHADEVAN, JJ
PON SELVARAJ & ORS. – Appellant
Versus
THE STATE OF TAMIL NADU & ORS. – Respondent
Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s). 3336/2024
Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: Mr. P. Chidambaram, Sr. Adv., Mr. S. Nagamuthu, Sr. Adv., Mr. M.p. Parthiban, AOR, Ms. Priyaranjani Nagamuthu, Adv., Mr. Bilal Mansoor, Adv., Mr. Shreyas Kaushal, Adv., Mr. S. Geyolin Selvam, Adv., Mr. Amit Kumar Sr. Adv., Mr. Anand Sathiyaseelan, Adv., Ms. Harshika Verma, Adv., Mr. Aditya Shaner Pandey, Adv., Mr. Himanshu Sehrawat, Adv., Mr. Aditya Kumar, Adv., Mr. Anurag Sahay, Adv., Mr. Rakesh Sharma R., AOR, Mr. P. S. Patwalia, Sr. Adv., Mr. K. L. Janjani, AOR, Mr. Pankaj Kumar Singh, Adv., Mr. Kailash J. Kashyap, Adv., Mr. Sabarish Subramanian, AOR
For the Respondents: Mr. Ravi Mehrotra, Sr. Adv., Mrs. Shantha Devi Raman, Adv., Mr. Garvesh Kabra, AOR, Mrs. Pooja Kabra, Adv., Mr. Ananyo Roy, Adv., Mr. Apoorv Srivastava, Adv., Mr. A Velan, AOR, Mr. Balaji Subramanian, A.A.G., Mr. Sabarish Subramanian, AOR, Mr. Vishnu Unnikrishnan, Adv., Mr. Akash Kundu, Adv., Mr. M.p. Parthiban, AOR, Mr. A Saseedharan, Adv., Ms. Sonakshi Malhan, AOR, Mr. A. Mariarputham, Sr. Adv., Mr. K Lenin Devasahaya Vinober, Adv., Mr. Ankit Sharma, Adv., Mr. Mridul Gupta, Adv., Mr. Dharma Datta Verma, Adv., Mr. Rohit Verma, Adv., Ms. Anuradha Arputham, AOR, Mr. A. Lakshminarayanan, AOR.
Procedural fairness in handling petitions for special leave to appeal emphasizes the necessity of allowing relevant materials to be presented in court.
Headnote:The Supreme Court in its judgment analyzed the procedural aspects surrounding Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal, particularly focusing on the intervention applications and permissions to file additional documents. The court emphasized the importance of orderly process in handling such petitions. The core issues revolved around procedural fairness and the right to present relevant materials before the court. The court logically concluded to grant hearing requests and scheduled a future date for further proceedings.
Back
