Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: Mr. Yash Pal Dhingra
For the Respondents: Mr. Sarad Kumar Singhania

The court has the authority to dismiss appeals for want of prosecution when parties fail to appear or press their cases.

Headnote:The Supreme Court, in the case of Civil Appeal No. 9818 of 2011, dismissed the appeal for want of prosecution, indicating the failure of the appellants and respondents to present their arguments. The court framed the issue around the lack of appearance and dismissed the case accordingly. The final verdict was to dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution.

ORDER

1. The case has been taken up in the revised call.

2. None appears on behalf of the appellants or for respondents to press the appeal.

3. The appeal is, accordingly, dismissed for want of prosecution.

4. Interim order(s), if any, stands discharged.

5. Pending application(s), if any, shall stand disposed of.

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :