Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

2026 Supreme(Online)(SC) 231

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
MR. AHSANUDDIN AMANULLAH, MR. R. MAHADEVAN, JJ
JAI NARAIN VYAS UNIVERSITY JODHPUR & ANR. – Appellant
Versus
RAJESH BORANA – Respondent
Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s). 1258/2024 | SLP(C) No. 1745/2024 | SLP(C) No. 1487/2024 | SLP(C) No. 1641/2024 | SLP(C) No. 1643/2024 | SLP(C) No. 1281/2024 | SLP(C) No. 1638/2024 | SLP(C) No. 3207/2024 | SLP(C) No. 1554/2024 | SLP(C) No. 1852/2024 | SLP(C) No. 1349/2024 | SLP(C) No. 1337/2024 | SLP(C) No. 1870/2024 | SLP(C) No. 1673/2024 | SLP(C) No. 1579/2024 | SLP(C) No. 8445/2024 | SLP(C) No. 8438/2024 | SLP(C) No. 8462/2024 | SLP(C) No. 8453/2024 | SLP(C) No. 8485/2024 | SLP(C) No. 8440/2024 | SLP(C) No. 8465/2024 | SLP(C) No. 8439/2024 | SLP(C) No. 8454/2024 | SLP(C) No. 8443/2024 | SLP(C) No. 8480/2024 | SLP(C) No. 8487/2024 | SLP(C) No. 8457/2024 | SLP(C) No. 8459/2024 | SLP(C) No. 8460/2024 | SLP(C) No. 8461/2024 | SLP(C) No. 8448/2024 | SLP(C) No. 8489/2024 | SLP(C) No. 8484/2024

Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: Mr. Vipin Sanghi, Sr. Adv., Ms. Adwaita Sharma, Adv., Mr. Vikalp Mudgal, AOR, Mr. Abhishekh Chadhary, Adv., Mr. Kshitij Mudgal, Adv., Mr. Ansh Mittal, Adv., Mr. Amit Jaysingh, Adv.
For the Respondents: Mr. Huzefa Aziz Ahmadi, Sr. Adv., Mr. Mohit Choudhary, Adv., Mr. Jasmeet Singh, Adv., Mr. R.s. Saluja, Adv., Ms. Rusheet Saluja, AOR, Mr. Saif Ali, Adv., Mr. Pushpendra Singh Bhadoriya, Adv., Mr. Achraj Singh Saluja, Adv., Mr. Ajith Williyam, Adv., Mr. Vijay Sharma, Adv., Mr. Bilal, Adv., Mr. Pranav Menon, Adv., Mr. Saurav, Adv., Ms. Parul Shukla, AOR, Ms. Shubhangi Pandey, Adv., Mr. Rajesh Kumar, AOR, Mr. Nihar Jain, Adv., Mr. Dhiraj K Sammi, Adv., Mr. Krishan Kant Kumar, Adv., Mr. K. Paari Vendhan, AOR, Mr. Rishabh Sancheti, Adv., Mrs. Padma Priya, Adv., Ms. Padma Priya, Adv., Mr. Nishant Kumar Singh, Adv., Mr. Nishant Kumar, Adv., Mr. Aquib Ali Khan, Adv.

The court upheld interim orders pending further hearings, affirming the necessity of judicial consideration before a substantive decision.

Headnote:This appeal arises from the final judgment and order dated 07-11-2023 passed by the High Court of Judicature for Rajasthan at Jodhpur in DBSAW No. 601/2023. The petitioners challenged the interim orders made due to time constraints preventing a proper hearing. The Supreme Court found it necessary to extend the interim order until the next scheduled court date of 12-03-2026. The primary question addressed was whether the current circumstances justified the extension of prior orders pending the hearing. The court concluded that the existing interim orders should continue, given the lack of sufficient time for hearing the merits of the case. The petition for Special Leave to Appeal was thus permitted to remain in effect until the next date.

Table of Content
1. hearing delayed due to time constraints. (Para 1)
2. interim orders extended pending next hearing. (Para 2 , 3)

ORDER

The matter could not be taken up for hearing due to paucity of time.

2. However, interim order to continue till the next date of listing.

3. List on 12.03.2026.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document