SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(SC) 232

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
MR. SANJAY KUMAR, MR. K. VINOD CHANDRAN, JJ
MANISH JOGI – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF RAJASTHAN & ANR. – Respondent
Petition for Special Leave to Appeal (Crl.) No. 15503/2025



Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: Mr. Ankit Anandraj Shah, AOR, Deepak Guglani, Mr. Arpit Bamal, Adv., Ms. Malvika Raghavan, Adv.
For the Respondents: Ms. Nidhi Jaswal, AOR, Ms. Nitika Rawat, Adv., Ms. Amiy Shukla, AOR, Mr. Aman Khan, Adv.

Interim bail granted for negotiation on sale deed cancellation; conditions imposed.

Headnote:In terms of interim relief, the court considered the proposal of the petitioner to cancel the sale deed in exchange for a refund of payments and agreed to grant interim bail for one month subject to conditions. The court emphasized the necessity of an undertaking regarding the producer for the cancellation deed by the petitioner while allowing him to negotiate with the second respondent. Re-listing was scheduled for 12.03.2026.

ORDER

Ms. Amiy Shukla, learned counsel, states that she contacted respondent No. 2, Sharda Devi, but was unable to secure instructions as to whether respondent No. 2 would be agreeable to the proposal made by the petitioner, Manish Jogi, that he would ensure cancellation of the sale deed executed in his favour upon refund of the monies paid by him. Needless to state, in case such a proposal is accepted, the petitioner would also have to bear the stamp duties and registration expenses for the execution as well as the cancellation of the sale deed in question.

As Ms. Amiy Shukla, learned counsel, is unable to secure instructions in this regard, we permit the petitioner, Manish Jogi, to be released on interim bail for a period of one month on appropriate terms and conditions to be fixed by the trial Court, to enable him to contact respondent No. 2, Sharda Devi, and her husband, who are stated to be related to him, so as to persuade them to agree to his proposal.

The petitioner, Manish Jogi, shall also file an undertaking before the trial Court to the effect that he would surrender within one month from the date of his release. This undertaking shall also indicate in clear terms the willingness of the petitioner to execute a cancellation/re-conveyance deed in favour of respondent No. 2. Filing of this undertaking shall be in addition to the terms and conditions that may be fixed by the trial Court. A copy of such an undertaking shall also be produced before this Court on the next date of hearing.

Re-list on 12.03.2026.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top