Back
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
Not mentioned,
SADHVI LAXMI DAS – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF MP & ANR. – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. appellant's charges related to multiple ipc sections and it act. (Para 2) |
| 2. counsel emphasized the appellant's incarceration and absence of respondent representation. (Para 3 , 4) |
| 3. court considered gender and duration of incarceration in granting bail. (Para 5) |
| 4. impugned order set aside; bail granted with trial court conditions. (Para 6 , 7) |
| 5. pending applications disposed of. (Para 8) |
ORDER
1. Leave granted.
2.The appellant has been arraigned as an accused in FIR No.603/2024, registered at Police Station – Chourai, District Chhindwara, M.P. for the offence punishable under Sections 420 , 120-B, 406, 404 and 403 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 , and Section 66 (c) of the Information Technology Act, 2000 .
3. The learned counsel appearing for the appellant submitted that apart from the period of incarceration undergone by the appellant, the chargesheet has been filed. Further, the appellant is a lady.
4. Despite notice served, none appears for the respondents.
5. Taking into consideration the fact that the appellant is a lady, has been under incarceration for more than six months, and the fact that the chargesheet has already been filed, we are inclined to set aside
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
