Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

2026 Supreme(Online)(SC) 235

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
MRS. B.V. NAGARATHNA, MR. UJJAL BHUYAN, JJ
NATIONAL COMMISSION FOR INDIAN SYSTEM OF MEDICINE – Appellant
Versus
HARIDWAR AYURVEDA MEDICAL COLLEGE AND RESEARCH CENTER – Respondent
CIVIL APPEAL NO(S). 125/2025 | C.A. No. 126/2025

Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: Ms. Ankita Chaudhary, Mr. Shreyas Balaji, Mr. Chand Kapoor
For the Respondents: Miss Meha Ashok Aggarwal, Mr. Mohd. Irshad Hanif, Mr. Mohammed Imtiyaz Ahmed, Mr. Virender Maurya, Mr. Syed Moosa Mohammed Quadri, Dr. Dr. Lakshmi Prasanna Komara, Mr. Sudarshan Lamba, Mr. Kanakamedala Ravindra Kumar, Mr. Devraj Bhattacharjee, Mr. Madhav Sinhal, Mr. Medha Pushkarna, Mr. Rajbahadur Yadav, Mr. Sanjay Sharawat, Mr. Ravi Kant, Mr. Mayank Manish, Mr. Chandra Prakash, Mr. Vineet Upadhyay, Mr. Vivek Singh, Mr. C.p. Rajwar, Mr. Chandrashekhar Singh, Mr. Jayant Dubey, Mr. Ayush Anand, Mr. Abhinav Kumar, Ms. Mukti Chowdhary, Mr. Md. Sadath Hussain, Mr. Md Irshad Ahmad, Ms. Padmavathi Yakama, Ms. Nikita Kumari

Pending Civil Appeals do not impede the High Court's resolution of Writ Petitions regarding college admissions.

Headnote:The Supreme Court reviewed the Civil Appeals involving the National Commission for Indian System of Medicine and the Haridwar Ayurveda Medical College and Research Center. The Court underlined the importance of resolving pending Writ Petitions by the High Court while considering expeditious disposal requests from the Colleges. Findings emphasized the need for appropriate lawfulness in admissions and handling of Writ Petitions. The Court acknowledged pending status would not impede ongoing High Court proceedings. The final directive advised the High Court to evaluate requests for expedited considerations.

ORDER

1. We have heard learned counsel for the petitioners-National Commission for Indian System of Medicine and Another and learned counsel for the respondent- College(s) as well as learned senior counsel and learned counsel for the students.

2. We observe that the pendency of these Civil Appeals before this Court would not come in the way of the High Court disposing of the Writ Petitions filed by the respondent-College(s).

3. It is needless to observe that if a request is made by the respondent-College(s) for expeditious disposal of the Writ Petitions, the said prayers shall be considered by the High Court having regard to the fact that there have been certain admissions of the students made by the said colleges and in accordance with law.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document

2026 Supreme(Online)(SC) 235

SUPREME COURT OF INDIAMRS. B.V. NAGARATHNA, MR. UJJAL BHUYAN, JJNATIONAL COMMISSION FOR INDIAN SYSTEM OF MEDICINE – AppellantVersusHARIDWAR AYURVEDA MEDICAL COLLEGE AND RESEARCH CENTER – RespondentCIVIL APPEAL NO(S). 125/2025 | C.A. No. 126/2025

Pending Civil Appeals do not impede the High Court's resolution of Writ Petitions regarding college admissions.

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
MRS. B.V. NAGARATHNA, MR. UJJAL BHUYAN, JJ
NATIONAL COMMISSION FOR INDIAN SYSTEM OF MEDICINE – Appellant
Versus
HARIDWAR AYURVEDA MEDICAL COLLEGE AND RESEARCH CENTER – Respondent
CIVIL APPEAL NO(S). 125/2025 | C.A. No. 126/2025