SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(SC) 236

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
SEETA RAM GUPTA – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF CHHATTISGARH – Respondent


ORDER

1. Leave granted.

2. The prayer made in the present case is for grant of regular bail to the appellant in connection with FIR No.35 of 2020 dated 15.03.2020 registered at Police Station Barmkela, District Raigarh, Chhatisgarh under Section 20(B) of the Narcotics Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 .

3. The argument raised by the learned counsel for the appellant is that he is carrying on the business of provision store. He was never sought to be arrested for a period of about 4 years, though it is claimed by the learned counsel for the State that his name cropped up in the statement made by the co-accused under Section 161 of the Criminal Procedure Code, 1973. It is not in dispute that nothing was recovered from the possession of the appellant.

4. After hearing learned counsel for the parties and considering the aforesaid facts, in our view, the appellant deserves to be released on bail pending trial.

5. The appellant is directed to be released on regular bail pending trial subject to the terms and conditions to be imposed by the Trial Court.

6. The appeal is accordingly allowed.

7. Pending application(s), if any, shall also stand disposed of.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top