SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(SC) 238

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
KESHAV SHARMA – Appellant
Versus
POOJA SHARMA – Respondent


Table of Content
1. petitioner seeks case transfer. (Para 1)
2. court denies transfer, suggests video conferencing. (Para 2 , 3)
3. final orders are issued. (Para 4)

ORDER

T.P. (C) No. 3239 of 2025

T.P. (Crl.) No. 1081 of 2025

2. Having heard learned counsel appearing for the parties and taking into consideration the grounds taken in the transfer petitions, we are not inclined to transfer the cases sought for. The Transfer Petitions are, accordingly, dismissed.

4. Pending application(s), if any, shall stand disposed of.

1. The Transfer Petitions are dismissed in terms of the signed order.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top