The court dismissed transfer petitions for family and criminal cases, suggesting use of video conferencing instead.

ORDER

1. The petitioner-husband has filed these petitions under Section 25 of the Code of Civil Procedure , 1908 and Section 446 of the BNSS , 2024 seeking transfer of the following cases :-

T.P. (C) No. 3239 of 2025

“Family Suit No. 416 of 2021 titled as “Pooja Vs. Keshav Swayam Sharma” pending before the Principal Judge, Family Court, Rajkot to the Court of Principal Judge, Family Court – Hisar, Haryana.

T.P. (Crl.) No. 1081 of 2025

“CRMAJ 85 of 2019 titled as “Puja Keshav Sharma vs. Keshav Swayam Sharma & Anr.” pending before the Court of 2^nd Addl. Civil Judge & JMFC, Rajkot to the Court of Civil Judge Junior Division – Hisar, Haryana.”

2. Having heard learned counsel appearing for the parties and taking into consideration the grounds taken in the transfer petitions, we are not inclined to transfer the cases sought for. The Transfer Petitions are, accordingly, dismissed.

3. However, if the video conferencing facility is available with the Court, the benefit of the same shall be extended to the parties, unless their presence is necessarily required.

4. Pending application(s), if any, shall stand disposed of.

ORDER

1. The Transfer Petitions are dismissed in terms of the signed order.

2. Pending interlocutory application(s), if any, is/are disposed of.