What is the legal standard for granting bail when chargesheet is filed and there is no evidence linking the accused to the crime? What is the effect of non-inclusion of the accused in the FIR on bail jurisdiction when a co-accused implicates them? What are the conditional requirements for releasing the appellant on bail in relation to the specified FIR and sections of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita?

Key Points: - The appellant was not named in the FIR and was implicated by a co-accused, as recoveries were made from the co-accused (!) . - The High Court denied regular bail, which was challenged and found not warranted since the chargesheet had been filed and there was no direct evidence linking the appellant (!) (!) (!) . - The Supreme Court allowed the appeal, set aside the impugned order, and granted bail on such terms and conditions as fixed by the trial court (!) (!) . - The Court clarified that no observations on the merits of the case were made, limited to the bail grant (!) . - The appellant is to be released on bail in connection with FIR No. 356/2024, P.S. Bheldi, District Saran, Bihar, for offenses under Sections 310(2) and 317(3) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 (!) (!) . - The continuation of pending applications was disposed of in light of the bail order (!) (!) . - The decision indicates bail can be granted when chargesheet is filed and there is no evidence linking the accused to the crime (!) . - The appellant must cooperate during trial and not seek unnecessary adjournments (!) .

What is the legal standard for granting bail when chargesheet is filed and there is no evidence linking the accused to the crime?

What is the effect of non-inclusion of the accused in the FIR on bail jurisdiction when a co-accused implicates them?

What are the conditional requirements for releasing the appellant on bail in relation to the specified FIR and sections of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita?